Model comparison
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct vs Qwen3.6 27B
Qwen3.6 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.2 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIA
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 27B leads 52.4 to 32.0.
Side by side
| Nemotron 4 340b Instruct | Qwen3.6 27B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 42.2 |
| Released | 2024-06-14 | 2026-04-22 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.60 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $3.60 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3.6 27B leads
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 35.2 (#228), Qwen3.6 27B: 39.1 (#163)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 37.3% |
| LMArena Coding | 1209 | — |
Reasoning Qwen3.6 27B leads
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 23.4 (#178), Qwen3.6 27B: 25.0 (#153)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0.9% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 22% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1202 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 7% |
| DTBench | — | 78.1% |
| LMCA | — | 34.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.5 |
Math Qwen3.6 27B leads
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 34.3 (#195), Qwen3.6 27B: 48.5 (#62)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 35.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 91.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1216 | — |
Knowledge Qwen3.6 27B leads
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 32.0 (#216), Qwen3.6 27B: 52.4 (#63)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 85.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1171 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.9 (#233), Qwen3.6 27B: —
| Benchmark | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1206 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1214 | — |
| LMArena French | 1197 | — |
| LMArena German | 1192 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1128 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1148 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1219 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1195 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 63.1 (#232), Qwen3.6 27B: —
| Benchmark | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1203 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.1 (#221), Qwen3.6 27B: —
| Benchmark | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1225 | — |
Writing & Preference Qwen3.6 27B leads
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 42.7 (#233), Qwen3.6 27B: 50.3 (#181)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1225 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1203 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1026 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1214 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Nemotron 4 340b Instruct better than Qwen3.6 27B?
Qwen3.6 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.2 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Nemotron 4 340b Instruct or Qwen3.6 27B better for coding?
Qwen3.6 27B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.1 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Nemotron 4 340b Instruct and Qwen3.6 27B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 27B has 11.