Model comparison

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct vs Qwen3.5 Plus

Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 35.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct NVIDIA

35.3

Rank #218 Confirmed

Qwen3.5 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

42.3

Rank #103 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.5 Plus leads 47.9 to 31.7.
  • Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct and Qwen3.5 Plus specifications
Nemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3.5 Plus
ProviderNVIDIAAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index35.342.3
Released2024-06-142026-02-16
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$2.40
Results tracked1715

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 34.6 (#223), Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3.5 Plus
LMArena Coding1209—
ALE-Bench—621.92

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: —, Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3.5 Plus
Vending-Bench 2—0.54

Reasoning Qwen3.5 Plus leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 22.4 (#180), Qwen3.5 Plus: 32.0 (#67)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3.5 Plus
Chess Puzzles—22%
LMArena Hard Prompts1202—
Mystery Game Puzzles—17%
DTBench—80.5%
LMCA—36.4%
Epoch Capabilities Index—146.79

Math Qwen3.5 Plus leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 31.7 (#193), Qwen3.5 Plus: 47.9 (#55)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3.5 Plus
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—86.7%
LMArena Math1216—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—21%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—2.1%

Knowledge Qwen3.5 Plus leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 31.4 (#212), Qwen3.5 Plus: 46.0 (#78)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3.5 Plus
GPQA Diamond—84.8%
SimpleQA Verified—25.4%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—10.7%
LMArena Expert1171—

Multilingual Not comparable

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 38.0 (#228), Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3.5 Plus
LMArena Non-English1206—
LMArena Chinese1214—
LMArena French1196—
LMArena German1192—
LMArena Japanese1128—
LMArena Korean1148—
LMArena Russian1219—
LMArena Spanish1195—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 63.3 (#227), Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3.5 Plus
LMArena Instruction Following1203—

Long Context Qwen3.5 Plus leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.1 (#216), Qwen3.5 Plus: 42.9 (#109)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3.5 Plus
CL-bench—19.8%
CL-bench Life—12.4%
LMArena Longer Query1225—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 42.9 (#229), Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3.5 Plus
LMArena Text1225—
LMArena Creative Writing1203—
LMArena Multi-Turn1214—

Frequently asked questions

Is Nemotron 4 340b Instruct better than Qwen3.5 Plus?

Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 35.3 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Nemotron 4 340b Instruct and Qwen3.5 Plus share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Plus has 15.

Related comparisons

Go deeper