Model comparison
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.3 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads 31.7 to 15.3.
Side by side
| Nemotron 4 340b Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 35.3 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2024-06-14 | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.70 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.80 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 32B Instruct leads
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 34.6 (#223), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 38.1 (#165)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45% |
| LMArena Coding | 1209 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 52.3% |
Reasoning Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 22.4 (#180), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 18.5 (#262)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1202 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 128.52 |
Math Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 31.7 (#193), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 15.3 (#289)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 7.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1216 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.1% |
Knowledge Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 31.4 (#212), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 24.9 (#259)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 46.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1171 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 38.0 (#228), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1206 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1214 | — |
| LMArena French | 1196 | — |
| LMArena German | 1192 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1128 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1148 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1219 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1195 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 63.3 (#227), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1203 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.1 (#216), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1225 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 42.9 (#229), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1225 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1203 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1214 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Nemotron 4 340b Instruct better than Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.3 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Nemotron 4 340b Instruct or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct better for coding?
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.1 versus 34.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Nemotron 4 340b Instruct and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has 7.