Model comparison

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.3 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct NVIDIA

35.3

Rank #218 Confirmed

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct Alibaba (Qwen)

29.7

Rank #291 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads 31.7 to 15.3.

Side by side

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct specifications
Nemotron 4 340b InstructQwen2.5 32B Instruct
ProviderNVIDIAAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index35.329.7
Released2024-06-142024-09
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—8K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.70
Output $ / M tokens—$2.80
Results tracked177

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen2.5 32B Instruct leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 34.6 (#223), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 38.1 (#165)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen2.5 32B Instruct
BigCodeBench Instruct—45%
LMArena Coding1209—
BigCodeBench Complete—52.3%

Reasoning Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 22.4 (#180), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 18.5 (#262)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen2.5 32B Instruct
Chess Puzzles—0%
LMArena Hard Prompts1202—
Epoch Capabilities Index—128.52

Math Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 31.7 (#193), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 15.3 (#289)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen2.5 32B Instruct
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—7.4%
LMArena Math1216—
MATH Level 5—56.1%

Knowledge Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 31.4 (#212), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 24.9 (#259)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen2.5 32B Instruct
GPQA Diamond—46.1%
LMArena Expert1171—

Multilingual Not comparable

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 38.0 (#228), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen2.5 32B Instruct
LMArena Non-English1206—
LMArena Chinese1214—
LMArena French1196—
LMArena German1192—
LMArena Japanese1128—
LMArena Korean1148—
LMArena Russian1219—
LMArena Spanish1195—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 63.3 (#227), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen2.5 32B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following1203—

Long Context Not comparable

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.1 (#216), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen2.5 32B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1225—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 42.9 (#229), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen2.5 32B Instruct
LMArena Text1225—
LMArena Creative Writing1203—
LMArena Multi-Turn1214—

Frequently asked questions

Is Nemotron 4 340b Instruct better than Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.3 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Nemotron 4 340b Instruct or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.1 versus 34.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Nemotron 4 340b Instruct and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper