Model comparison

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct vs Qwen1.5-32B

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct NVIDIA

35.9

Rank #223 Confirmed

Qwen1.5-32B Alibaba (Qwen)

30.5

Rank #293 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Nemotron 4 340b Instruct scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-32B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads 32.0 to 13.5.

Side by side

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct and Qwen1.5-32B specifications
Nemotron 4 340b InstructQwen1.5-32B
ProviderNVIDIAAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index35.930.5
Released2024-06-142024-02-04
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1721

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 35.2 (#228), Qwen1.5-32B: 31.7 (#282)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen1.5-32B
LMArena Coding12091155
BigCodeBench Instruct—32.3%
BigCodeBench Complete—42%

Reasoning Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 23.4 (#178), Qwen1.5-32B: 21.8 (#212)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen1.5-32B
LMArena Hard Prompts12021130

Math Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 34.3 (#195), Qwen1.5-32B: 33.0 (#207)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen1.5-32B
LMArena Math12161155

Knowledge Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 32.0 (#216), Qwen1.5-32B: 13.5 (#296)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen1.5-32B
LMArena Expert11711126
GPQA Diamond—30.7%
MMLU—74.4%

Multilingual Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.9 (#233), Qwen1.5-32B: 31.4 (#259)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen1.5-32B
LMArena Non-English12061106
LMArena Chinese12141177
LMArena French11971101
LMArena German11921058
LMArena Japanese11281027
LMArena Korean11481008
LMArena Russian12191073
LMArena Spanish11951089

Instruction Following Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 63.1 (#232), Qwen1.5-32B: 57.7 (#265)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen1.5-32B
LMArena Instruction Following12031116

Long Context Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.1 (#221), Qwen1.5-32B: 34.7 (#246)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen1.5-32B
LMArena Longer Query12251146

Writing & Preference Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 42.7 (#233), Qwen1.5-32B: 34.2 (#271)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen1.5-32B
LMArena Text12251137
LMArena Creative Writing12031083
LMArena Multi-Turn12141140

Frequently asked questions

Is Nemotron 4 340b Instruct better than Qwen1.5-32B?

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Nemotron 4 340b Instruct or Qwen1.5-32B better for coding?

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.2 versus 31.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Nemotron 4 340b Instruct and Qwen1.5-32B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-32B has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper