Model comparison

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct vs Qwen1.5-110B

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 34.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct NVIDIA

35.9

Rank #223 Confirmed

Qwen1.5-110B Alibaba (Qwen)

34.2

Rank #234 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Nemotron 4 340b Instruct scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-110B in 0 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads 42.7 to 38.0.

Side by side

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct and Qwen1.5-110B specifications
Nemotron 4 340b InstructQwen1.5-110B
ProviderNVIDIAAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index35.934.2
Released2024-06-142024-04-25
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1720

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 35.2 (#228), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.0 (#264)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Coding12091184
BigCodeBench Instruct—35%
BigCodeBench Complete—44.4%

Reasoning Too close to call

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 23.4 (#178), Qwen1.5-110B: 22.7 (#189)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Hard Prompts12021168
ForecastBench—57.7

Math Too close to call

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 34.3 (#195), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.7 (#201)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Math12161185

Knowledge Too close to call

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 32.0 (#216), Qwen1.5-110B: 31.2 (#219)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Expert11711144

Multilingual Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.9 (#233), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.6 (#250)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Non-English12061142
LMArena Chinese12141206
LMArena French11971151
LMArena German11921123
LMArena Japanese11281074
LMArena Korean11481044
LMArena Russian12191118
LMArena Spanish11951142

Instruction Following Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 63.1 (#232), Qwen1.5-110B: 60.3 (#252)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Instruction Following12031158

Long Context Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.1 (#221), Qwen1.5-110B: 35.1 (#242)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Longer Query12251157

Writing & Preference Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 42.7 (#233), Qwen1.5-110B: 38.0 (#255)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Text12251175
LMArena Creative Writing12031148
LMArena Multi-Turn12141160

Frequently asked questions

Is Nemotron 4 340b Instruct better than Qwen1.5-110B?

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 34.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Nemotron 4 340b Instruct or Qwen1.5-110B better for coding?

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.2 versus 33.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Nemotron 4 340b Instruct and Qwen1.5-110B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-110B has 20.

Related comparisons

Go deeper