Model comparison
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think
Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIA
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Nemotron 4 340b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Think in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads 35.7 to 32.0.
Side by side
| Nemotron 4 340b Instruct | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 37.9 |
| Released | 2024-06-14 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 35.2 (#228), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.7 (#189)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1209 | 1291 |
Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 23.4 (#178), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 25.2 (#150)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1202 | 1272 |
Math Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 34.3 (#195), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 36.3 (#168)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1216 | 1305 |
Knowledge Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 32.0 (#216), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.7 (#181)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1171 | 1295 |
Multilingual Too close to call
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.9 (#233), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.1 (#231)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1206 | 1209 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1214 | 1242 |
| LMArena French | 1197 | 1260 |
| LMArena German | 1192 | 1262 |
| LMArena Russian | 1219 | 1193 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1195 | 1289 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1128 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1148 | — |
Instruction Following Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 63.1 (#232), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.6 (#218)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1203 | 1247 |
Long Context Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.1 (#221), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#195)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1225 | 1272 |
Writing & Preference Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 42.7 (#233), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.2 (#220)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1225 | 1272 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1203 | 1226 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1214 | 1252 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Nemotron 4 340b Instruct better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?
Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Nemotron 4 340b Instruct or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?
Olmo 3.1 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.7 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Nemotron 4 340b Instruct and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?
15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has 17 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.