Model comparison
Nemotron-4 15B vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#156); Nemotron-4 15B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both.
Side by side
| Nemotron-4 15B | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | — | 39.9 |
| Released | 2024-02-26 | 2026-07-15 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.03 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.13 |
| Results tracked | 8 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Reasoning Not comparable
Nemotron-4 15B: —, Qwen3.7 Flash: 28.2 (#108)
| Benchmark | Nemotron-4 15B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 107.72 | 144.64 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 43.8% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 23% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 15% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 58.7% | — |
| HellaSwag | 82.4% | — |
| PIQA | 82.4% | — |
| WinoGrande | 78% | — |
Math Not comparable
Nemotron-4 15B: —, Qwen3.7 Flash: 38.3 (#140)
| Benchmark | Nemotron-4 15B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 19.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| GSM8K | 46% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Nemotron-4 15B: —, Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#75)
| Benchmark | Nemotron-4 15B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 82.3% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 55.5% | — |
| MMLU | 58.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Nemotron-4 15B better than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#156); Nemotron-4 15B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Nemotron-4 15B and Qwen3.7 Flash share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Nemotron-4 15B has 8 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.