Model comparison
Nemotron-4 15B vs Qwen3-1.7B
Qwen3-1.7B has enough public results to be ranked (#336); Nemotron-4 15B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIA
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- Qwen3-1.7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Nemotron-4 15B | Qwen3-1.7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | — | 26.6 |
| Released | 2024-02-26 | 2025-04-29 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 8 | 4 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Nemotron-4 15B: —, Qwen3-1.7B: 24.7 (#115)
| Benchmark | Nemotron-4 15B | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 28.4% |
Reasoning Not comparable
Nemotron-4 15B: —, Qwen3-1.7B: 19.2 (#267)
| Benchmark | Nemotron-4 15B | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 58.7% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 107.72 | — |
| HellaSwag | 82.4% | — |
| PIQA | 82.4% | — |
| WinoGrande | 78% | — |
Math Not comparable
Nemotron-4 15B: —, Qwen3-1.7B: 16.3 (#294)
| Benchmark | Nemotron-4 15B | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 8.1% |
| GSM8K | 46% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Nemotron-4 15B: —, Qwen3-1.7B: 19.6 (#278)
| Benchmark | Nemotron-4 15B | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 38% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 55.5% | — |
| MMLU | 58.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Nemotron-4 15B better than Qwen3-1.7B?
Qwen3-1.7B has enough public results to be ranked (#336); Nemotron-4 15B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Nemotron-4 15B and Qwen3-1.7B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nemotron-4 15B has 8 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-1.7B has 4.