Model comparison
Nemotron-4 15B vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#267); Nemotron-4 15B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIA
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both.
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Nemotron-4 15B | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | — | 31.9 |
| Released | 2024-02-26 | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $5.60 |
| Results tracked | 8 | 43 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Nemotron-4 15B: —, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 33.2 (#260)
| Benchmark | Nemotron-4 15B | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | — | 16% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45.8% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1292 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 55.9% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Nemotron-4 15B: —, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 22.1 (#133)
| Benchmark | Nemotron-4 15B | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | — | 5.7% |
| BALROG | — | 16.2% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 35.8% |
Reasoning Not comparable
Nemotron-4 15B: —, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 22.3 (#199)
| Benchmark | Nemotron-4 15B | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BIG-Bench Hard | 58.7% | 79.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 107.72 | 129 |
| HellaSwag | 82.4% | 84.8% |
| PIQA | 82.4% | 82.6% |
| WinoGrande | 78% | 82.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1271 |
| DTBench | — | 62.9% |
| LMCA | — | 13.4% |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.5 |
Math Not comparable
Nemotron-4 15B: —, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 19.3 (#287)
| Benchmark | Nemotron-4 15B | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 8.1% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 33% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1283 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 63.2% |
| GSM8K | 46% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Nemotron-4 15B: —, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 27.0 (#253)
| Benchmark | Nemotron-4 15B | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 55.5% | 94.5% |
| MMLU | 58.7% | 85.3% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 49.1% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 63.1% |
| Confabulations | — | 19.1% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 42.6% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1245 |
| TriviaQA | — | 71.9% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Nemotron-4 15B: —, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 41.0 (#213)
| Benchmark | Nemotron-4 15B | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1252 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1272 |
| LMArena French | — | 1280 |
| LMArena German | — | 1234 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1180 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1188 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1264 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1256 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Nemotron-4 15B: —, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 65.5 (#221)
| Benchmark | Nemotron-4 15B | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 80.6% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1254 |
Long Context Not comparable
Nemotron-4 15B: —, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 38.9 (#188)
| Benchmark | Nemotron-4 15B | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1282 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Nemotron-4 15B: —, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 46.7 (#215)
| Benchmark | Nemotron-4 15B | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1269 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1221 |
| WildBench | — | 80.2% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1272 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Nemotron-4 15B better than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#267); Nemotron-4 15B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Nemotron-4 15B and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct share?
7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nemotron-4 15B has 8 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has 43.