Model comparison

Nemotron-4 15B vs Phi-4

Phi-4 has enough public results to be ranked (#269); Nemotron-4 15B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Nemotron-4 15B NVIDIA

—

Unranked

Phi-4 Microsoft

30.9

Rank #269 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both.
  • Phi-4 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Nemotron-4 15B and Phi-4 specifications
Nemotron-4 15BPhi-4
ProviderNVIDIAMicrosoft
Noometry Index—30.9
Released2024-02-262024-12-11
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—4K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.07
Output $ / M tokens—$0.14
Results tracked837

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Nemotron-4 15B: —, Phi-4: 33.8 (#237)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron-4 15BPhi-4
BigCodeBench Instruct—45.5%
LiveBench Coding—30.7%
LMArena Coding—1231
BigCodeBench Complete—55.4%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Nemotron-4 15B: —, Phi-4: 22.6 (#120)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron-4 15BPhi-4
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—28.8%
BALROG—11.6%

Reasoning Not comparable

Nemotron-4 15B: —, Phi-4: 17.0 (#287)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron-4 15BPhi-4
Epoch Capabilities Index107.38130.43
Chess Puzzles—1%
LiveBench Reasoning—47.8%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1220
LiveBench Data Analysis—45.2%
BIG-Bench Hard58.7%—
HellaSwag82.4%—
LiveBench—41.6%
PIQA82.4%—
WinoGrande78%—

Math Not comparable

Nemotron-4 15B: —, Phi-4: 19.6 (#279)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron-4 15BPhi-4
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—13.8%
LiveBench Math—42%
LMArena Math—1246
MATH Level 5—64.9%
GSM8K46%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Nemotron-4 15B: —, Phi-4: 32.5 (#204)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron-4 15BPhi-4
MMLU58.7%84.8%
GPQA Diamond—56.1%
Confabulations—29.4%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—3.7%
LMArena Expert—1203
ARC (AI2) Challenge55.5%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Nemotron-4 15B: —, Phi-4: 37.4 (#232)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron-4 15BPhi-4
LMArena Non-English—1197
LMArena Chinese—1211
LMArena French—1223
LMArena German—1222
LMArena Japanese—1158
LMArena Korean—1151
LMArena Russian—1209
LMArena Spanish—1234

Instruction Following Not comparable

Nemotron-4 15B: —, Phi-4: 60.6 (#246)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron-4 15BPhi-4
LiveBench Instruction Following—58.4%
LMArena Instruction Following—1201

Long Context Not comparable

Nemotron-4 15B: —, Phi-4: 36.9 (#221)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron-4 15BPhi-4
LMArena Longer Query—1217

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Nemotron-4 15B: —, Phi-4: 40.7 (#239)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron-4 15BPhi-4
LMArena Text—1217
LMArena Creative Writing—1182
Short-Story Creative Writing—62.6%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1206
LiveBench Language—25.6%

Frequently asked questions

Is Nemotron-4 15B better than Phi-4?

Phi-4 has enough public results to be ranked (#269); Nemotron-4 15B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Nemotron-4 15B and Phi-4 share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nemotron-4 15B has 8 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper