Model comparison
Nemotron-4 15B vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#168); Nemotron-4 15B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIA
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Nemotron-4 15B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | — | 38.8 |
| Released | 2024-02-26 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 8 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Nemotron-4 15B: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 38.9 (#154)
| Benchmark | Nemotron-4 15B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1346 |
Reasoning Not comparable
Nemotron-4 15B: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 25.4 (#131)
| Benchmark | Nemotron-4 15B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1322 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 58.7% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 107.38 | — |
| HellaSwag | 82.4% | — |
| PIQA | 82.4% | — |
| WinoGrande | 78% | — |
Math Not comparable
Nemotron-4 15B: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 33.6 (#169)
| Benchmark | Nemotron-4 15B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1305 |
| GSM8K | 46% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Nemotron-4 15B: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 35.4 (#175)
| Benchmark | Nemotron-4 15B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1307 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 55.5% | — |
| MMLU | 58.7% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Nemotron-4 15B: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.8 (#185)
| Benchmark | Nemotron-4 15B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1304 |
| LMArena French | — | 1328 |
| LMArena German | — | 1283 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1206 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1268 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1337 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Nemotron-4 15B: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.8 (#182)
| Benchmark | Nemotron-4 15B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1298 |
Long Context Not comparable
Nemotron-4 15B: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#161)
| Benchmark | Nemotron-4 15B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1312 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Nemotron-4 15B: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.4 (#179)
| Benchmark | Nemotron-4 15B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1309 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Nemotron-4 15B better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#168); Nemotron-4 15B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Nemotron-4 15B and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nemotron-4 15B has 8 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.