Noometry

Model comparison

Nemotron 3 Ultra vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Nemotron 3 Ultra is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Flash costs 17× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Nemotron 3 Ultra's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.

Nemotron 3 Ultra NVIDIA

42.5

Rank #113 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Flash Alibaba (Qwen)

39.9

Rank #156 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Nemotron 3 Ultra scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3.7 Flash in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Nemotron 3 Ultra leads 52.5 to 48.9.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Chess Puzzles: 12% for Nemotron 3 Ultra and 23% for Qwen3.7 Flash.
  • Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.03 / $0.13 per million input/output tokens, against $0.50 / $2.20 for Nemotron 3 Ultra.
  • Qwen3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
  • Nemotron 3 Ultra has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Nemotron 3 UltraQwen3.7 Flash
ProviderNVIDIAAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index42.539.9
Released2026-06-042026-07-15
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window262K1M
Max output128K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.50$0.03
Output $ / M tokens$2.20$0.13
Results tracked307

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Nemotron 3 Ultra: 38.1 (#182), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkNemotron 3 UltraQwen3.7 Flash
FrontierCode13.6%—
SciCode40.3%—
WeirdML43.5%—
LMArena Coding1468—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Nemotron 3 Ultra: 23.4 (#126), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkNemotron 3 UltraQwen3.7 Flash
APEX-Agents22.7%—

Reasoning Nemotron 3 Ultra leads

Nemotron 3 Ultra: 31.0 (#82), Qwen3.7 Flash: 28.2 (#108)

BenchmarkNemotron 3 UltraQwen3.7 Flash
Chess Puzzles12%23%
Mystery Game Puzzles20%15%
Epoch Capabilities Index146.17144.64
NYT Connections (extended)—43.8%
CritPt3.1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1452—
DTBench90.1%—
LMCA36.9%—

Math Qwen3.7 Flash leads

Nemotron 3 Ultra: 35.3 (#187), Qwen3.7 Flash: 38.3 (#140)

BenchmarkNemotron 3 UltraQwen3.7 Flash
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202586.7%86.7%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—19.3%
ProofBench2%—
LMArena Math1457—

Knowledge Nemotron 3 Ultra leads

Nemotron 3 Ultra: 52.5 (#61), Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#75)

BenchmarkNemotron 3 UltraQwen3.7 Flash
GPQA Diamond85.4%82.3%
LMArena Expert1472—

Multilingual Not comparable

Nemotron 3 Ultra: 53.5 (#64), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkNemotron 3 UltraQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Non-English1427—
LMArena Chinese1497—
LMArena French1472—
LMArena German1471—
LMArena Korean1386—
LMArena Russian1417—
LMArena Spanish1454—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Nemotron 3 Ultra: 74.7 (#88), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkNemotron 3 UltraQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following1418—

Long Context Not comparable

Nemotron 3 Ultra: 43.9 (#81), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkNemotron 3 UltraQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Longer Query1437—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Nemotron 3 Ultra: 66.3 (#36), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkNemotron 3 UltraQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Text1445—
LMArena Creative Writing1398—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1692—
LMArena Multi-Turn1411—

Frequently asked questions

Is Nemotron 3 Ultra better than Qwen3.7 Flash?

Nemotron 3 Ultra is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Flash costs 17× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Nemotron 3 Ultra's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3 Ultra or Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.03 per million input tokens and $0.13 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3 Ultra lists at $0.50 and $2.20.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Nemotron 3 Ultra and Qwen3.7 Flash share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nemotron 3 Ultra has 30 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper