Model comparison
Nemotron 3 Super vs Ring-2.6-1T
Nemotron 3 Super has enough public results to be ranked (#153); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIA
Ant Group (inclusionAI)Summary
- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Nemotron 3 Super scores higher in 0 categories and Ring-2.6-1T in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Ring-2.6-1T leads 26.1 to 18.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 36% for Nemotron 3 Super and 42.4% for Ring-2.6-1T.
Side by side
| Nemotron 3 Super | Ring-2.6-1T | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Ant Group (inclusionAI) |
| Noometry Index | 40.1 | 36.9 |
| Released | 2026-03-11 | 2026-05-14 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.08 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.45 | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Ring-2.6-1T leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 39.4 (#158), Ring-2.6-1T: 40.7
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 36% | 42.4% |
| ALE-Bench | 213.9 | 432.57 |
| WeirdML | 38% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1403 | — |
Reasoning Ring-2.6-1T leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 18.7 (#276), Ring-2.6-1T: 26.1
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 3.1% | 3.7% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 15.4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1386 | — |
Math Not comparable
Nemotron 3 Super: 39.6 (#101), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 60.4% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1380 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Nemotron 3 Super: 38.9 (#139), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1398 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Nemotron 3 Super: 48.4 (#144), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1355 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1432 | — |
| LMArena French | 1405 | — |
| LMArena German | 1341 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1336 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1417 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Nemotron 3 Super: 71.2 (#154), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1347 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Nemotron 3 Super: 41.5 (#139), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1362 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Nemotron 3 Super: 55.9 (#140), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1378 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1317 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1369 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Nemotron 3 Super better than Ring-2.6-1T?
Nemotron 3 Super has enough public results to be ranked (#153); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is Nemotron 3 Super or Ring-2.6-1T better for coding?
Ring-2.6-1T scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.7 versus 39.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Nemotron 3 Super and Ring-2.6-1T share?
3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nemotron 3 Super has 21 scored results on Noometry and Ring-2.6-1T has 3.