Model comparison
Nemotron 3 Super vs Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 40.1 on the Noometry Index. Nemotron 3 Super costs 5.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Nemotron 3 Super scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads 31.1 to 18.7.
- Nemotron 3 Super is cheaper at $0.08 / $0.45 per million input/output tokens, against $0.50 / $2 for Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct.
- Nemotron 3 Super accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 131K.
Side by side
| Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 40.1 | 43.0 |
| Released | 2026-03-11 | 2025-09 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | 131K |
| Max output | 131K | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.08 | $0.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.45 | $2 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 25 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 39.4 (#158), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 42.5 (#98)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1403 | 1440 |
| SciCode | 36% | — |
| WeirdML | 38% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 213.9 | — |
Reasoning Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 18.7 (#276), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 31.1 (#81)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1386 | 1428 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 66.7% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 15.4% | — |
| CritPt | 3.1% | — |
Math Too close to call
Nemotron 3 Super: 39.6 (#101), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 38.8 (#126)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1380 | 1440 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 60.4% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 46.7% |
Knowledge Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 38.9 (#139), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 41.8 (#106)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1398 | 1417 |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 78.6% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 9.3% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 63% |
Multilingual Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 48.4 (#144), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 52.1 (#93)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1355 | 1407 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1432 | 1460 |
| LMArena French | 1405 | 1413 |
| LMArena German | 1341 | 1417 |
| LMArena Russian | 1336 | 1404 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1417 | 1435 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1364 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Nemotron 3 Super: 71.2 (#154), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 70.8 (#159)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1347 | 1389 |
| IFEval | — | 81% |
Long Context Nemotron 3 Super leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 41.5 (#139), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 37.0 (#223)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1362 | 1403 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 55.6% |
Writing & Preference Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 55.9 (#140), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 58.0 (#121)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1378 | 1417 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1317 | 1334 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1369 | 1416 |
| WildBench | — | 80.7% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Nemotron 3 Super better than Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct?
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 40.1 on the Noometry Index. Nemotron 3 Super costs 5.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3 Super or Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct?
Nemotron 3 Super is cheaper. It lists at $0.08 per million input tokens and $0.45 per million output tokens; Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct lists at $0.50 and $2.
Is Nemotron 3 Super or Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct better for coding?
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.5 versus 39.4 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Nemotron 3 Super does, with 262K tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks do Nemotron 3 Super and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct share?
15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nemotron 3 Super has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct has 25.
Related comparisons
- Nemotron 3 Super vs Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10
- Nemotron 3 Super vs MiMo-V2-Pro
- Nemotron 3 Super vs Claude Opus 4
- Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct vs Mistral Medium 3.5
- Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct vs Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1
- Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct vs Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5