Model comparison
Nemotron 3 Super vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Nemotron 3 Super is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.1 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIA
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Nemotron 3 Super scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3 Coder Next in 1 category; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3 Coder Next leads 22.4 to 18.7.
- Nemotron 3 Super is cheaper at $0.08 / $0.45 per million input/output tokens, against $0.12 / $0.80 for Qwen3 Coder Next.
Side by side
| Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen3 Coder Next | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 40.1 | 34.3 |
| Released | 2026-03-11 | 2026-02-02 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | 262K |
| Max output | 131K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.08 | $0.12 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.45 | $0.80 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Nemotron 3 Super leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 39.4 (#158), Qwen3 Coder Next: 36.3 (#210)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 36% | 32.3% |
| WeirdML | 38% | 34.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1403 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 213.9 | — |
Reasoning Qwen3 Coder Next leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 18.7 (#276), Qwen3 Coder Next: 22.4 (#196)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 3.1% | 0% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 15.4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1386 | — |
Math Not comparable
Nemotron 3 Super: 39.6 (#101), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 60.4% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1380 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Nemotron 3 Super: 38.9 (#139), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1398 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Nemotron 3 Super: 48.4 (#144), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1355 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1432 | — |
| LMArena French | 1405 | — |
| LMArena German | 1341 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1336 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1417 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Nemotron 3 Super: 71.2 (#154), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1347 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Nemotron 3 Super: 41.5 (#139), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1362 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Nemotron 3 Super: 55.9 (#140), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1378 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1317 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1369 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Nemotron 3 Super better than Qwen3 Coder Next?
Nemotron 3 Super is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.1 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3 Super or Qwen3 Coder Next?
Nemotron 3 Super is cheaper. It lists at $0.08 per million input tokens and $0.45 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Coder Next lists at $0.12 and $0.80.
Is Nemotron 3 Super or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?
Nemotron 3 Super scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.4 versus 36.3 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both accept 262K tokens.
How many benchmarks do Nemotron 3 Super and Qwen3 Coder Next share?
3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nemotron 3 Super has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.