Model comparison
Nemotron 3 Super vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 40.1 on the Noometry Index. Nemotron 3 Super costs 4.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.7 Plus's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Nemotron 3 Super scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.7 Plus in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 39.3 to 18.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 15.4% for Nemotron 3 Super and 74.8% for Qwen3.7 Plus.
- Nemotron 3 Super is cheaper at $0.08 / $0.45 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $1.60 for Qwen3.7 Plus.
- Qwen3.7 Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
- Nemotron 3 Super has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen3.7 Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 40.1 | 45.3 |
| Released | 2026-03-11 | 2026-06-02 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 262K | 1M |
| Max output | 131K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.08 | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.45 | $1.60 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 32 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Nemotron 3 Super leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 39.4 (#158), Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 36% | 45.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1403 | 1473 |
| FrontierCode | — | 10.2% |
| WeirdML | 38% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 213.9 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Nemotron 3 Super: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 2.8% |
Reasoning Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 18.7 (#276), Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 15.4% | 74.8% |
| CritPt | 3.1% | 9.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1386 | 1460 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 24% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 84% |
| LMCA | — | 37.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 147.37 |
Math Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 39.6 (#101), Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1380 | 1466 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 34.4% |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 60.4% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 93.3% |
Knowledge Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 38.9 (#139), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1398 | 1467 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87.9% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Nemotron 3 Super: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1279 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1444 |
Multilingual Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 48.4 (#144), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1355 | 1445 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1432 | 1510 |
| LMArena French | 1405 | 1473 |
| LMArena German | 1341 | 1471 |
| LMArena Russian | 1336 | 1457 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1417 | 1457 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1413 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1415 |
Instruction Following Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 71.2 (#154), Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1347 | 1440 |
Long Context Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 41.5 (#139), Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1362 | 1455 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 55.9 (#140), Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1378 | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1317 | 1439 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1369 | 1460 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Nemotron 3 Super better than Qwen3.7 Plus?
Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 40.1 on the Noometry Index. Nemotron 3 Super costs 4.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.7 Plus's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3 Super or Qwen3.7 Plus?
Nemotron 3 Super is cheaper. It lists at $0.08 per million input tokens and $0.45 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Plus lists at $0.40 and $1.60.
Is Nemotron 3 Super or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?
Nemotron 3 Super scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.4 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.7 Plus does, with 1M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do Nemotron 3 Super and Qwen3.7 Plus share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nemotron 3 Super has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.