Model comparison

Nemotron 3 Super vs Qwen2-72B

Nemotron 3 Super is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.1 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Nemotron 3 Super NVIDIA

40.1

Rank #153 Confirmed

Qwen2-72B Alibaba (Qwen)

30.0

Rank #300 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Nemotron 3 Super scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen2-72B in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Nemotron 3 Super leads 38.9 to 21.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is WeirdML: 38% for Nemotron 3 Super and 11.3% for Qwen2-72B.

Side by side

Nemotron 3 Super and Qwen2-72B specifications
Nemotron 3 SuperQwen2-72B
ProviderNVIDIAAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index40.130.0
Released2026-03-112024-06-07
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.08—
Output $ / M tokens$0.45—
Results tracked2126

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Nemotron 3 Super leads

Nemotron 3 Super: 39.4 (#158), Qwen2-72B: 29.1 (#310)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen2-72B
WeirdML38%11.3%
LMArena Coding14031196
SciCode36%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—38.5%
BigCodeBench Complete—54%
ALE-Bench213.9—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Nemotron 3 Super: —, Qwen2-72B: 17.0 (#146)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen2-72B
TheAgentCompany—1.1%
METR Time Horizons—29.9%

Reasoning Qwen2-72B leads

Nemotron 3 Super: 18.7 (#276), Qwen2-72B: 23.2 (#181)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen2-72B
LMArena Hard Prompts13861191
NYT Connections (extended)15.4%—
CritPt3.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index—125.28

Math Nemotron 3 Super leads

Nemotron 3 Super: 39.6 (#101), Qwen2-72B: 30.2 (#236)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen2-72B
LMArena Math13801235
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions60.4%—
MATH Level 5—39.1%

Knowledge Nemotron 3 Super leads

Nemotron 3 Super: 38.9 (#139), Qwen2-72B: 21.2 (#275)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen2-72B
LMArena Expert13981171
GPQA Diamond—40.8%
MMLU—82.4%

Multilingual Nemotron 3 Super leads

Nemotron 3 Super: 48.4 (#144), Qwen2-72B: 35.9 (#244)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen2-72B
LMArena Non-English13551176
LMArena Chinese14321240
LMArena French14051170
LMArena German13411151
LMArena Russian13361169
LMArena Spanish14171169
LMArena Japanese—1111
LMArena Korean—1083

Instruction Following Nemotron 3 Super leads

Nemotron 3 Super: 71.2 (#154), Qwen2-72B: 61.7 (#241)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen2-72B
LMArena Instruction Following13471181

Long Context Nemotron 3 Super leads

Nemotron 3 Super: 41.5 (#139), Qwen2-72B: 36.1 (#235)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen2-72B
LMArena Longer Query13621192

Writing & Preference Nemotron 3 Super leads

Nemotron 3 Super: 55.9 (#140), Qwen2-72B: 40.8 (#241)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen2-72B
LMArena Text13781203
LMArena Creative Writing13171181
LMArena Multi-Turn13691196

Frequently asked questions

Is Nemotron 3 Super better than Qwen2-72B?

Nemotron 3 Super is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.1 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Nemotron 3 Super or Qwen2-72B better for coding?

Nemotron 3 Super scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.4 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Nemotron 3 Super and Qwen2-72B share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nemotron 3 Super has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2-72B has 26.

Related comparisons

Go deeper