Model comparison

Nemotron 3 Super vs Phi-4 Mini

Nemotron 3 Super is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.1 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Nemotron 3 Super NVIDIA

40.1

Rank #153 Confirmed

Phi-4 Mini Microsoft

30.9

Rank #283 Reported

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Nemotron 3 Super scores higher in 2 categories and Phi-4 Mini in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Nemotron 3 Super leads 38.9 to 25.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 36% for Nemotron 3 Super and 10.8% for Phi-4 Mini.
  • Phi-4 Mini is cheaper at $0.075 / $0.30 per million input/output tokens, against $0.08 / $0.45 for Nemotron 3 Super.
  • Nemotron 3 Super accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

Nemotron 3 Super and Phi-4 Mini specifications
Nemotron 3 SuperPhi-4 Mini
ProviderNVIDIAMicrosoft
Noometry Index40.130.9
Released2026-03-112024-12-11
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K128K
Max output131K4K
Input $ / M tokens$0.08$0.075
Output $ / M tokens$0.45$0.30
Results tracked213

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Nemotron 3 Super leads

Nemotron 3 Super: 39.4 (#158), Phi-4 Mini: 28.1 (#317)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperPhi-4 Mini
SciCode36%10.8%
WeirdML38%—
LMArena Coding1403—
ALE-Bench213.9—

Reasoning Phi-4 Mini leads

Nemotron 3 Super: 18.7 (#276), Phi-4 Mini: 22.4 (#195)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperPhi-4 Mini
CritPt3.1%0%
NYT Connections (extended)15.4%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1386—

Math Not comparable

Nemotron 3 Super: 39.6 (#101), Phi-4 Mini: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperPhi-4 Mini
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions60.4%—
LMArena Math1380—

Knowledge Nemotron 3 Super leads

Nemotron 3 Super: 38.9 (#139), Phi-4 Mini: 25.3 (#262)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperPhi-4 Mini
Vectara Hallucination Rate—23.5%
LMArena Expert1398—

Multilingual Not comparable

Nemotron 3 Super: 48.4 (#144), Phi-4 Mini: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperPhi-4 Mini
LMArena Non-English1355—
LMArena Chinese1432—
LMArena French1405—
LMArena German1341—
LMArena Russian1336—
LMArena Spanish1417—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Nemotron 3 Super: 71.2 (#154), Phi-4 Mini: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperPhi-4 Mini
LMArena Instruction Following1347—

Long Context Not comparable

Nemotron 3 Super: 41.5 (#139), Phi-4 Mini: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperPhi-4 Mini
LMArena Longer Query1362—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Nemotron 3 Super: 55.9 (#140), Phi-4 Mini: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperPhi-4 Mini
LMArena Text1378—
LMArena Creative Writing1317—
LMArena Multi-Turn1369—

Frequently asked questions

Is Nemotron 3 Super better than Phi-4 Mini?

Nemotron 3 Super is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.1 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3 Super or Phi-4 Mini?

Phi-4 Mini is cheaper. It lists at $0.075 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3 Super lists at $0.08 and $0.45.

Is Nemotron 3 Super or Phi-4 Mini better for coding?

Nemotron 3 Super scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.4 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Nemotron 3 Super does, with 262K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Nemotron 3 Super and Phi-4 Mini share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nemotron 3 Super has 21 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 Mini has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper