Model comparison

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Wizardlm 70b

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.6 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B NVIDIA

40.6

Rank #147 Confirmed

Wizardlm 70b Microsoft

33.0

Rank #249 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads 52.3 to 34.8.

Side by side

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and Wizardlm 70b specifications
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BWizardlm 70b
ProviderNVIDIAMicrosoft
Noometry Index40.633.0
Released2025-12-15—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K—
Max output262K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.05—
Output $ / M tokens$0.20—
Results tracked1812

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 40.5 (#138), Wizardlm 70b: 31.4 (#285)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BWizardlm 70b
LMArena Coding13781081

Reasoning Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 27.1 (#124), Wizardlm 70b: 20.7 (#234)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BWizardlm 70b
LMArena Hard Prompts13481079

Math Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 37.8 (#147), Wizardlm 70b: 32.2 (#218)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BWizardlm 70b
LMArena Math13711116

Knowledge Not comparable

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 38.2 (#148), Wizardlm 70b: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BWizardlm 70b
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.6%—
LMArena Expert1355—

Multilingual Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 45.8 (#162), Wizardlm 70b: 29.6 (#265)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BWizardlm 70b
LMArena Non-English13201078
LMArena Chinese13821052
LMArena German13481083
LMArena Russian13031155
LMArena French1396—
LMArena Japanese1268—
LMArena Korean1269—
LMArena Spanish1376—

Instruction Following Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 68.8 (#180), Wizardlm 70b: 56.3 (#273)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BWizardlm 70b
LMArena Instruction Following13041093

Long Context Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 39.5 (#175), Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#263)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BWizardlm 70b
LMArena Longer Query13001097

Writing & Preference Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 52.3 (#174), Wizardlm 70b: 34.8 (#269)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BWizardlm 70b
LMArena Text13481120
LMArena Creative Writing12691149
LMArena Multi-Turn13191108

Frequently asked questions

Is Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B better than Wizardlm 70b?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.6 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.5 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and Wizardlm 70b share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has 18 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper