Model comparison

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Sonar

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B NVIDIA

39.9

Rank #144 Confirmed

Sonar Perplexity

37.8

Rank #184 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads 26.0 to 20.3.
  • Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is cheaper at $0.05 / $0.20 per million input/output tokens, against $1 / $1 for Sonar.
  • Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.
  • Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and Sonar specifications
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BSonar
ProviderNVIDIAPerplexity
Noometry Index39.937.8
Released2025-12-152024-01-01
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window262K128K
Max output262K4K
Input $ / M tokens$0.05$1
Output $ / M tokens$0.20$1
Results tracked187

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 39.9 (#139), Sonar: 35.1 (#217)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BSonar
LiveBench Coding—35.1%
LMArena Coding1378—

Reasoning Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 26.0 (#123), Sonar: 20.3 (#221)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BSonar
LiveBench Reasoning—46.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts1348—
LiveBench Data Analysis—37.9%
LiveBench—46.9%

Math Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 35.0 (#147), Sonar: 31.3 (#197)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BSonar
LiveBench Math—41.6%
LMArena Math1369—

Knowledge Not comparable

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 37.6 (#145), Sonar: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BSonar
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.6%—
LMArena Expert1354—

Multilingual Not comparable

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 46.0 (#158), Sonar: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BSonar
LMArena Non-English1320—
LMArena Chinese1382—
LMArena French1396—
LMArena German1349—
LMArena Japanese1270—
LMArena Korean1269—
LMArena Russian1303—
LMArena Spanish1377—

Instruction Following Sonar leads

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 69.0 (#175), Sonar: 71.5 (#146)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BSonar
LiveBench Instruction Following—76.2%
LMArena Instruction Following1303—

Long Context Not comparable

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 39.5 (#170), Sonar: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BSonar
LMArena Longer Query1300—

Writing & Preference Too close to call

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 52.5 (#169), Sonar: 52.6 (#166)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BSonar
LMArena Text1348—
LMArena Creative Writing1269—
LMArena Multi-Turn1319—
LiveBench Language—44.1%

Frequently asked questions

Is Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B better than Sonar?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B or Sonar?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is cheaper. It lists at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; Sonar lists at $1 and $1.

Is Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B or Sonar better for coding?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.9 versus 35.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B does, with 262K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and Sonar share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has 18 scored results on Noometry and Sonar has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper