Model comparison
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.6 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIA
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads 27.1 to 22.4.
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is cheaper at $0.05 / $0.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.12 / $0.80 for Qwen3 Coder Next.
Side by side
| Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B | Qwen3 Coder Next | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 40.6 | 34.3 |
| Released | 2025-12-15 | 2026-02-02 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | 262K |
| Max output | 262K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.05 | $0.12 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.20 | $0.80 |
| Results tracked | 18 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 40.5 (#138), Qwen3 Coder Next: 36.3 (#210)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 32.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 34.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1378 | — |
Reasoning Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 27.1 (#124), Qwen3 Coder Next: 22.4 (#196)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1348 | — |
Math Not comparable
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 37.8 (#147), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1371 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 38.2 (#148), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1355 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 45.8 (#162), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1320 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1382 | — |
| LMArena French | 1396 | — |
| LMArena German | 1348 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1268 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1269 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1303 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1376 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 68.8 (#180), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1304 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 39.5 (#175), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1300 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 52.3 (#174), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1348 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1269 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1319 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B better than Qwen3 Coder Next?
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.6 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B or Qwen3 Coder Next?
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is cheaper. It lists at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Coder Next lists at $0.12 and $0.80.
Is Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.5 versus 36.3 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both accept 262K tokens.
How many benchmarks do Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and Qwen3 Coder Next share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.