Model comparison

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Olmo 7b Instruct

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.6 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B NVIDIA

40.6

Rank #147 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B scores higher in 6 categories and Olmo 7b Instruct in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads 52.3 to 25.8.

Side by side

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and Olmo 7b Instruct specifications
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BOlmo 7b Instruct
ProviderNVIDIAAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index40.630.3
Released2025-12-15—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K—
Max output262K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.05—
Output $ / M tokens$0.20—
Results tracked1810

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 40.5 (#138), Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Coding13781016

Reasoning Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 27.1 (#124), Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts1348993

Math Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 37.8 (#147), Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Math13711018

Knowledge Not comparable

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 38.2 (#148), Olmo 7b Instruct: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BOlmo 7b Instruct
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.6%—
LMArena Expert1355—

Multilingual Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 45.8 (#162), Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Non-English1320977
LMArena Chinese13821014
LMArena Russian1303947
LMArena French1396—
LMArena German1348—
LMArena Japanese1268—
LMArena Korean1269—
LMArena Spanish1376—

Instruction Following Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 68.8 (#180), Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following1304978

Long Context Not comparable

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 39.5 (#175), Olmo 7b Instruct: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1300—

Writing & Preference Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 52.3 (#174), Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Text13481032
LMArena Creative Writing1269990
LMArena Multi-Turn13191007

Frequently asked questions

Is Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B better than Olmo 7b Instruct?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.6 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B or Olmo 7b Instruct better for coding?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.5 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and Olmo 7b Instruct share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has 18 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 7b Instruct has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper