Model comparison

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning and Qwen3.7 Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.3 vs 39.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning NVIDIA

39.3

Rank #156 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Flash Alibaba (Qwen)

39.5

Rank #152 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 48.9 to 36.9.
  • Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.03 / $0.13 per million input/output tokens, against $0.06 / $0.16 for Nemotron 3.5 Lightning.
  • Qwen3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
  • Nemotron 3.5 Lightning has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning and Qwen3.7 Flash specifications
Nemotron 3.5 LightningQwen3.7 Flash
ProviderNVIDIAAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index39.339.5
Released2026-08-112026-07-15
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window262K1M
Max output262K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.06$0.03
Output $ / M tokens$0.16$0.13
Results tracked187

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 39.6 (#143), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 LightningQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Coding1370—

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Flash leads

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 25.7 (#128), Qwen3.7 Flash: 27.3 (#108)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 LightningQwen3.7 Flash
NYT Connections (extended)—43.8%
Chess Puzzles—23%
LMArena Hard Prompts1335—
Mystery Game Puzzles—15%
Epoch Capabilities Index—144.62

Math Qwen3.7 Flash leads

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 34.7 (#156), Qwen3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#100)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 LightningQwen3.7 Flash
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—19.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—86.7%
LMArena Math1355—

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Flash leads

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 36.9 (#154), Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#69)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 LightningQwen3.7 Flash
GPQA Diamond—82.3%
LMArena Expert1354—

Multilingual Not comparable

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 44.0 (#175), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 LightningQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Non-English1292—
LMArena Chinese1356—
LMArena French1369—
LMArena German1280—
LMArena Japanese1213—
LMArena Korean1233—
LMArena Russian1257—
LMArena Spanish1321—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 69.8 (#166), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 LightningQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following1317—

Long Context Not comparable

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 39.9 (#160), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 LightningQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Longer Query1312—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 48.5 (#198), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 LightningQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Text1324—
LMArena Creative Writing1254—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1280—
LMArena Multi-Turn1327—

Frequently asked questions

Is Nemotron 3.5 Lightning better than Qwen3.7 Flash?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning and Qwen3.7 Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.3 vs 39.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning or Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.03 per million input tokens and $0.13 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3.5 Lightning lists at $0.06 and $0.16.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Nemotron 3.5 Lightning and Qwen3.7 Flash share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper