Model comparison

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning vs o3-pro

o3-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 40.0 on the Noometry Index. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning costs 400× less per token, which makes it the better buy when o3-pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning NVIDIA

40.0

Rank #155 Confirmed

o3-pro OpenAI

42.9

Rank #105 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in long context, where o3-pro leads 72.2 to 39.9.
  • Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is cheaper at $0.05 / $0.20 per million input/output tokens, against $20 / $80 for o3-pro.
  • Nemotron 3.5 Lightning accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 200K.
  • Nemotron 3.5 Lightning has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning and o3-pro specifications
Nemotron 3.5 Lightningo3-pro
ProviderNVIDIAOpenAI
Noometry Index40.042.9
Released2026-08-112025-06-10
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window262K200K
Max output262K100K
Input $ / M tokens$0.05$20
Output $ / M tokens$0.20$80
Results tracked1812

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding o3-pro leads

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 40.4 (#141), o3-pro: 55.5 (#24)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Lightningo3-pro
Aider Polyglot—84.9%
WeirdML—58.2%
LMArena Coding1375—

Reasoning Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 26.8 (#127), o3-pro: 23.8 (#171)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Lightningo3-pro
ARC-AGI-2—4.9%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—72.1%
ARC-AGI-1—59.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts1337—
DTBench—86.9%
LMCA—38.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—147.42

Math Not comparable

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 37.5 (#155), o3-pro: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Lightningo3-pro
LMArena Math1359—

Knowledge Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 37.5 (#154), o3-pro: 29.5 (#238)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Lightningo3-pro
Confabulations—14.2%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—23.3%
LMArena Expert1356—

Multilingual Not comparable

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 44.0 (#180), o3-pro: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Lightningo3-pro
LMArena Non-English1295—
LMArena Chinese1359—
LMArena French1366—
LMArena German1282—
LMArena Japanese1206—
LMArena Korean1238—
LMArena Russian1253—
LMArena Spanish1345—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 69.6 (#170), o3-pro: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Lightningo3-pro
LMArena Instruction Following1318—

Long Context o3-pro leads

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 39.9 (#165), o3-pro: 72.2 (#1)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Lightningo3-pro
Fiction.LiveBench—97.2%
LMArena Longer Query1314—

Writing & Preference o3-pro leads

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 48.5 (#201), o3-pro: 57.1 (#133)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Lightningo3-pro
LMArena Text1327—
LMArena Creative Writing1254—
Short-Story Creative Writing—84.4%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1280—
LMArena Multi-Turn1328—

Frequently asked questions

Is Nemotron 3.5 Lightning better than o3-pro?

o3-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 40.0 on the Noometry Index. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning costs 400× less per token, which makes it the better buy when o3-pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning or o3-pro?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is cheaper. It lists at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; o3-pro lists at $20 and $80.

Is Nemotron 3.5 Lightning or o3-pro better for coding?

o3-pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 40.4 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning does, with 262K tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks do Nemotron 3.5 Lightning and o3-pro share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning has 18 scored results on Noometry and o3-pro has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper