Model comparison

Muse Spark vs StarCoder 2 3B

Muse Spark has enough public results to be ranked (#46); StarCoder 2 3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark Meta

50.6

Rank #46 Confirmed

StarCoder 2 3B NVIDIA

36.3

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Muse Spark scores higher in 1 category and StarCoder 2 3B in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Muse Spark leads 46.2 to 33.5.
  • StarCoder 2 3B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Muse Spark and StarCoder 2 3B specifications
Muse SparkStarCoder 2 3B
ProviderMetaNVIDIA
Noometry Index50.636.3
Released2026-04-082024-02-22
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked277

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69), StarCoder 2 3B: 33.5

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkStarCoder 2 3B
SciCode51.5%—
LMArena Coding1481—
BigCodeBench Complete—21.4%
HumanEval+—27.4%

Reasoning Not comparable

Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67), StarCoder 2 3B: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkStarCoder 2 3B
Epoch Capabilities Index152.0488.76
CritPt11.3%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1474—
WinoGrande—57.1%

Math Not comparable

Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66), StarCoder 2 3B: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkStarCoder 2 3B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202588.9%—
ProofBench17%—
LMArena Math1455—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)39%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)14.6%—
GSM8K—21.6%

Knowledge Not comparable

Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13), StarCoder 2 3B: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkStarCoder 2 3B
GPQA Diamond89.8%—
Humanity's Last Exam40.6%—
LMArena Expert1457—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—34.2%
MMLU—36.6%

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24), StarCoder 2 3B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkStarCoder 2 3B
LMArena Vision1306—
LMArena Document1444—

Multilingual Not comparable

Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24), StarCoder 2 3B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkStarCoder 2 3B
LMArena Non-English1464—
LMArena Chinese1509—
LMArena French1497—
LMArena German1497—
LMArena Korean1459—
LMArena Russian1466—
LMArena Spanish1472—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51), StarCoder 2 3B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkStarCoder 2 3B
LMArena Instruction Following1442—

Long Context Not comparable

Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69), StarCoder 2 3B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkStarCoder 2 3B
LMArena Longer Query1451—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39), StarCoder 2 3B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkStarCoder 2 3B
LMArena Text1474—
LMArena Creative Writing1459—
LMArena Multi-Turn1477—

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark better than StarCoder 2 3B?

Muse Spark has enough public results to be ranked (#46); StarCoder 2 3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is Muse Spark or StarCoder 2 3B better for coding?

Muse Spark scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.2 versus 33.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark and StarCoder 2 3B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Muse Spark has 27 scored results on Noometry and StarCoder 2 3B has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper