Model comparison

Muse Spark vs StarCoder 2 15B

Muse Spark has enough public results to be ranked (#41); StarCoder 2 15B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark Meta

50.3

Rank #41 Confirmed

StarCoder 2 15B NVIDIA

37.5

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Muse Spark scores higher in 1 category and StarCoder 2 15B in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Muse Spark leads 45.6 to 36.0.
  • StarCoder 2 15B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Muse Spark and StarCoder 2 15B specifications
Muse SparkStarCoder 2 15B
ProviderMetaNVIDIA
Noometry Index50.337.5
Released2026-04-082024-02-20
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked277

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 45.6 (#65), StarCoder 2 15B: 36.0

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkStarCoder 2 15B
SciCode51.5%—
LMArena Coding1482—
BigCodeBench Complete—38.4%
HumanEval+—37.8%

Reasoning Not comparable

Muse Spark: 34.9 (#61), StarCoder 2 15B: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkStarCoder 2 15B
Epoch Capabilities Index152.09104.61
CritPt11.3%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1475—
WinoGrande—64.3%

Math Not comparable

Muse Spark: 46.8 (#57), StarCoder 2 15B: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkStarCoder 2 15B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202588.9%—
ProofBench17%—
LMArena Math1455—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)39%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)14.6%—
GSM8K—57.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

Muse Spark: 65.7 (#12), StarCoder 2 15B: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkStarCoder 2 15B
GPQA Diamond89.8%—
Humanity's Last Exam40.6%—
LMArena Expert1458—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—47.2%
MMLU—64.1%

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark: 42.7 (#23), StarCoder 2 15B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkStarCoder 2 15B
LMArena Vision1306—
LMArena Document1444—

Multilingual Not comparable

Muse Spark: 56.3 (#23), StarCoder 2 15B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkStarCoder 2 15B
LMArena Non-English1464—
LMArena Chinese1507—
LMArena French1497—
LMArena German1497—
LMArena Korean1457—
LMArena Russian1467—
LMArena Spanish1471—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Muse Spark: 76.1 (#47), StarCoder 2 15B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkStarCoder 2 15B
LMArena Instruction Following1443—

Long Context Not comparable

Muse Spark: 44.4 (#65), StarCoder 2 15B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkStarCoder 2 15B
LMArena Longer Query1451—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Muse Spark: 66.2 (#37), StarCoder 2 15B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkStarCoder 2 15B
LMArena Text1474—
LMArena Creative Writing1460—
LMArena Multi-Turn1477—

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark better than StarCoder 2 15B?

Muse Spark has enough public results to be ranked (#41); StarCoder 2 15B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is Muse Spark or StarCoder 2 15B better for coding?

Muse Spark scores higher on coding benchmarks: 45.6 versus 36.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark and StarCoder 2 15B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Muse Spark has 27 scored results on Noometry and StarCoder 2 15B has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper