Model comparison
Muse Spark vs Ring-2.6-1T
Muse Spark has enough public results to be ranked (#41); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Ant Group (inclusionAI)Summary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark scores higher in 2 categories and Ring-2.6-1T in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark leads 34.9 to 25.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 51.5% for Muse Spark and 42.4% for Ring-2.6-1T.
- Ring-2.6-1T has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Muse Spark | Ring-2.6-1T | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Ant Group (inclusionAI) |
| Noometry Index | 50.3 | 36.3 |
| Released | 2026-04-08 | 2026-05-14 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 27 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 45.6 (#65), Ring-2.6-1T: 40.1
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 51.5% | 42.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1482 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 432.57 |
Reasoning Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 34.9 (#61), Ring-2.6-1T: 25.3
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 11.3% | 3.7% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1475 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 152.09 | — |
Math Not comparable
Muse Spark: 46.8 (#57), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 88.9% | — |
| ProofBench | 17% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1455 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 39% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 14.6% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Muse Spark: 65.7 (#12), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 89.8% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 40.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1458 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Muse Spark: 42.7 (#23), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1444 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Muse Spark: 56.3 (#23), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1464 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1507 | — |
| LMArena French | 1497 | — |
| LMArena German | 1497 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1457 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1467 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1471 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Muse Spark: 76.1 (#47), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1443 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Muse Spark: 44.4 (#65), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1451 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Muse Spark: 66.2 (#37), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1474 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1460 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1477 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Muse Spark better than Ring-2.6-1T?
Muse Spark has enough public results to be ranked (#41); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is Muse Spark or Ring-2.6-1T better for coding?
Muse Spark scores higher on coding benchmarks: 45.6 versus 40.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Muse Spark and Ring-2.6-1T share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark has 27 scored results on Noometry and Ring-2.6-1T has 3.