Model comparison

Muse Spark vs Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 43.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark Meta

50.6

Rank #46 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark leads 65.7 to 41.8.
  • Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Muse Spark and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct specifications
Muse SparkQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index50.643.0
Released2026-04-082025-09
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—33K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.50
Output $ / M tokens—$2
Results tracked2725

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 42.5 (#98)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Coding14811440
SciCode51.5%—

Reasoning Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 31.1 (#81)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14741428
Kagi LLM Benchmark—66.7%
CritPt11.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index152.04—

Math Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 38.8 (#126)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Math14551440
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202588.9%—
ProofBench17%—
Omni-MATH—46.7%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)39%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)14.6%—

Knowledge Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 41.8 (#106)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Expert14571417
GPQA Diamond89.8%—
Humanity's Last Exam40.6%—
MMLU-Pro—78.6%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—9.3%
GPQA (HELM)—63%

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Vision1306—
LMArena Document1444—

Multilingual Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 52.1 (#93)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Non-English14641407
LMArena Chinese15091460
LMArena French14971413
LMArena German14971417
LMArena Korean14591364
LMArena Russian14661404
LMArena Spanish14721435
LMArena Japanese—1395

Instruction Following Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 70.8 (#159)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14421389
IFEval—81%

Long Context Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 37.0 (#223)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14511403
Fiction.LiveBench—55.6%

Writing & Preference Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 58.0 (#121)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Text14741417
LMArena Creative Writing14591334
LMArena Multi-Turn14771416
WildBench—80.7%

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark better than Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct?

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 43.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Muse Spark or Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct better for coding?

Muse Spark scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.2 versus 42.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark has 27 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct has 25.

Related comparisons

Go deeper