Model comparison

Muse Spark vs Qwen3 8B

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark Meta

50.6

Rank #46 Confirmed

Qwen3 8B Alibaba (Qwen)

33.7

Rank #238 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark scores higher in 5 categories and Qwen3 8B in 0 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark leads 65.7 to 36.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 89.8% for Muse Spark and 56.8% for Qwen3 8B.
  • Qwen3 8B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Muse Spark and Qwen3 8B specifications
Muse SparkQwen3 8B
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index50.633.7
Released2026-04-082025-04
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—8K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.18
Output $ / M tokens—$0.70
Results tracked2711

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69), Qwen3 8B: 34.0 (#248)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3 8B
SciCode51.5%22.6%
LMArena Coding1481—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Muse Spark: —, Qwen3 8B: 30.2 (#78)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3 8B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—42.6%

Reasoning Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67), Qwen3 8B: 16.6 (#303)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3 8B
CritPt11.3%0%
Epoch Capabilities Index152.04136.17
Chess Puzzles—5%
LMArena Hard Prompts1474—
DTBench—59.7%
LMCA—8.8%

Math Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66), Qwen3 8B: 34.9 (#191)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3 8B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202588.9%56.1%
ProofBench17%—
LMArena Math1455—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)39%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)14.6%—

Knowledge Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13), Qwen3 8B: 36.1 (#173)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3 8B
GPQA Diamond89.8%56.8%
Humanity's Last Exam40.6%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—4.8%
LMArena Expert1457—

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24), Qwen3 8B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3 8B
LMArena Vision1306—
LMArena Document1444—

Multilingual Not comparable

Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24), Qwen3 8B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3 8B
LMArena Non-English1464—
LMArena Chinese1509—
LMArena French1497—
LMArena German1497—
LMArena Korean1459—
LMArena Russian1466—
LMArena Spanish1472—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51), Qwen3 8B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3 8B
LMArena Instruction Following1442—

Long Context Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69), Qwen3 8B: 37.9 (#210)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3 8B
Fiction.LiveBench—62.1%
LMArena Longer Query1451—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39), Qwen3 8B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3 8B
LMArena Text1474—
LMArena Creative Writing1459—
LMArena Multi-Turn1477—

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark better than Qwen3 8B?

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Muse Spark or Qwen3 8B better for coding?

Muse Spark scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.2 versus 34.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark and Qwen3 8B share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark has 27 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 8B has 11.

Related comparisons

Go deeper