Model comparison
Muse Spark vs Qwen3.5 Plus
Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 42.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen3.5 Plus in 1 category; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark leads 65.7 to 46.0.
Side by side
| Muse Spark | Qwen3.5 Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 50.6 | 42.9 |
| Released | 2026-04-08 | 2026-02-16 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.40 |
| Results tracked | 27 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 51.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1481 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 621.92 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Muse Spark: —, Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 0.54 |
Reasoning Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67), Qwen3.5 Plus: 32.8 (#74)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 152.04 | 146.78 |
| CritPt | 11.3% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 22% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1474 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 80.5% |
| LMCA | — | 36.4% |
Math Qwen3.5 Plus leads
Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66), Qwen3.5 Plus: 49.6 (#61)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 88.9% | 86.7% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 39% | 21% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 14.6% | 2.1% |
| ProofBench | 17% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1455 | — |
Knowledge Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13), Qwen3.5 Plus: 46.0 (#83)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 89.8% | 84.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 40.6% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 25.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1457 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1444 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1464 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1509 | — |
| LMArena French | 1497 | — |
| LMArena German | 1497 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1459 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1466 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1472 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1442 | — |
Long Context Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69), Qwen3.5 Plus: 43.0 (#113)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | — | 19.8% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 12.4% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1451 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1474 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1459 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1477 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Muse Spark better than Qwen3.5 Plus?
Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 42.9 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Muse Spark and Qwen3.5 Plus share?
5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark has 27 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Plus has 15.