Model comparison
Muse Spark vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview
Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 45.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark scores higher in 5 categories and Qwen3.5 Max Preview in 3 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark leads 65.7 to 41.8.
Side by side
| Muse Spark | Qwen3.5 Max Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 50.6 | 45.3 |
| Released | 2026-04-08 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 27 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 44.0 (#77)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1481 | 1487 |
| SciCode | 51.5% | — |
Reasoning Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 30.8 (#84)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1474 | 1483 |
| CritPt | 11.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 152.04 | — |
Math Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 40.1 (#94)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1455 | 1474 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 88.9% | — |
| ProofBench | 17% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 39% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 14.6% | — |
Knowledge Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.8 (#107)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1457 | 1489 |
| GPQA Diamond | 89.8% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 40.6% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1444 | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.2 (#22)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1464 | 1465 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1509 | 1534 |
| LMArena French | 1497 | 1484 |
| LMArena German | 1497 | 1487 |
| LMArena Korean | 1459 | 1438 |
| LMArena Russian | 1466 | 1471 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1472 | 1470 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1495 |
Instruction Following Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.0 (#31)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1442 | 1467 |
Long Context Too close to call
Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#45)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1451 | 1476 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.0 (#41)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1474 | 1470 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1459 | 1464 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1477 | 1478 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Muse Spark better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?
Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 45.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Muse Spark or Qwen3.5 Max Preview better for coding?
Muse Spark scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.2 versus 44.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Muse Spark and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark has 27 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.