Model comparison

Muse Spark vs Qwen3.5-Flash

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 21 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark Meta

50.6

Rank #46 Confirmed

Qwen3.5-Flash Alibaba (Qwen)

42.5

Rank #112 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen3.5-Flash in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark leads 65.7 to 43.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 89.8% for Muse Spark and 82.3% for Qwen3.5-Flash.

Side by side

Muse Spark and Qwen3.5-Flash specifications
Muse SparkQwen3.5-Flash
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index50.642.5
Released2026-04-082026-02-23
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.10
Output $ / M tokens—$0.40
Results tracked2732

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69), Qwen3.5-Flash: 34.2 (#242)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Coding14811412
LMArena WebDev—1244
SciCode51.5%—
ALE-Bench—221.8

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Muse Spark: —, Qwen3.5-Flash: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3.5-Flash
Vending-Bench 2—462.69

Reasoning Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67), Qwen3.5-Flash: 33.7 (#72)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts14741403
Epoch Capabilities Index152.04143.98
CritPt11.3%—
Chess Puzzles—21%
Mystery Game Puzzles—20%
DTBench—82.9%
LMCA—29.1%

Math Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66), Qwen3.5-Flash: 37.4 (#158)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3.5-Flash
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202588.9%84.4%
LMArena Math14551407
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)39%6.2%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)14.6%0%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—18.2%
ProofBench17%—

Knowledge Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13), Qwen3.5-Flash: 43.2 (#93)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3.5-Flash
GPQA Diamond89.8%82.3%
LMArena Expert14571407
Humanity's Last Exam40.6%—
SimpleQA Verified—20.3%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—10.5%

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24), Qwen3.5-Flash: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Vision1306—
LMArena Document1444—

Multilingual Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24), Qwen3.5-Flash: 50.5 (#121)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Non-English14641385
LMArena Chinese15091446
LMArena French14971412
LMArena German14971390
LMArena Korean14591344
LMArena Russian14661379
LMArena Spanish14721400
LMArena Japanese—1368

Instruction Following Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51), Qwen3.5-Flash: 72.6 (#139)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following14421374

Long Context Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69), Qwen3.5-Flash: 42.4 (#124)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Longer Query14511392

Writing & Preference Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39), Qwen3.5-Flash: 57.9 (#122)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Text14741397
LMArena Creative Writing14591343
LMArena Multi-Turn14771393

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark better than Qwen3.5-Flash?

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Muse Spark or Qwen3.5-Flash better for coding?

Muse Spark scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.2 versus 34.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark and Qwen3.5-Flash share?

21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark has 27 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5-Flash has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper