Model comparison

Muse Spark vs Qwen3.5 397B-A17B

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 45.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark Meta

50.3

Rank #41 Confirmed

Qwen3.5 397B-A17B Alibaba (Qwen)

45.7

Rank #60 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark scores higher in 9 categories and Qwen3.5 397B-A17B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark leads 65.7 to 53.3.
  • Qwen3.5 397B-A17B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Muse Spark and Qwen3.5 397B-A17B specifications
Muse SparkQwen3.5 397B-A17B
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index50.345.7
Released2026-04-082026-02-01
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.60
Output $ / M tokens—$3.60
Results tracked2736

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 45.6 (#65), Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 41.7 (#108)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3.5 397B-A17B
LMArena Coding14821464
LMArena WebDev—1400
SciCode51.5%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Muse Spark: —, Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 33.2 (#51)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3.5 397B-A17B
APEX-Agents—24.9%
τ²-bench Airline—81.5%
τ²-bench Banking—9.8%
τ²-bench Retail—84.4%
τ²-bench Telecom—97.8%

Reasoning Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 34.9 (#61), Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 33.6 (#62)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3.5 397B-A17B
LMArena Hard Prompts14751448
Epoch Capabilities Index152.09146.64
Kagi LLM Benchmark—73.7%
NYT Connections (extended)—58.9%
CritPt11.3%—
Chess Puzzles—13%
Thematic Generalization—65.1%
Mystery Game Puzzles—18%
DTBench—87.5%
LMCA—37.9%

Math Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 46.8 (#57), Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 44.9 (#64)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3.5 397B-A17B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202588.9%88.9%
LMArena Math14551455
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—31.2%
ProofBench17%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)39%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)14.6%—

Knowledge Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 65.7 (#12), Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 53.3 (#53)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3.5 397B-A17B
GPQA Diamond89.8%86.4%
LMArena Expert14581461
Humanity's Last Exam40.6%—

Multimodal Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 42.7 (#23), Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 40.0 (#42)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3.5 397B-A17B
LMArena Vision13061262
LMArena Document1444—

Multilingual Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 56.3 (#23), Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 54.0 (#56)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3.5 397B-A17B
LMArena Non-English14641431
LMArena Chinese15071501
LMArena French14971461
LMArena German14971447
LMArena Korean14571382
LMArena Russian14671429
LMArena Spanish14711443
LMArena Japanese—1427

Instruction Following Too close to call

Muse Spark: 76.1 (#47), Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 75.2 (#73)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3.5 397B-A17B
LMArena Instruction Following14431424

Long Context Too close to call

Muse Spark: 44.4 (#65), Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 44.1 (#71)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3.5 397B-A17B
LMArena Longer Query14511442

Writing & Preference Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 66.2 (#37), Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 62.5 (#74)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3.5 397B-A17B
LMArena Text14741438
LMArena Creative Writing14601401
LMArena Multi-Turn14771447
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1478

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark better than Qwen3.5 397B-A17B?

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 45.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Muse Spark or Qwen3.5 397B-A17B better for coding?

Muse Spark scores higher on coding benchmarks: 45.6 versus 41.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark and Qwen3.5 397B-A17B share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark has 27 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 397B-A17B has 36.

Related comparisons

Go deeper