Model comparison
Muse Spark vs Qwen3.5 35B-A3B
Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 42.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 21 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark leads 65.7 to 47.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 51.5% for Muse Spark and 29.3% for Qwen3.5 35B-A3B.
- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Muse Spark | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 50.6 | 42.0 |
| Released | 2026-04-08 | 2026-02-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Results tracked | 27 | 28 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 33.8 (#251)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 51.5% | 29.3% |
| LMArena Coding | 1481 | 1410 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1254 |
Reasoning Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 24.6 (#161)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 11.3% | 0.6% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1474 | 1400 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 152.04 | 142.52 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 10% |
| DTBench | — | 80% |
| LMCA | — | 29.5% |
Math Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 39.9 (#97)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 88.9% | 70% |
| LMArena Math | 1455 | 1404 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 56% |
| ProofBench | 17% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 39% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 14.6% | — |
Knowledge Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 47.8 (#79)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 89.8% | 83.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 1457 | 1408 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 40.6% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.5% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1444 | — |
Multilingual Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 50.0 (#127)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1464 | 1378 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1509 | 1457 |
| LMArena French | 1497 | 1412 |
| LMArena German | 1497 | 1367 |
| LMArena Korean | 1459 | 1356 |
| LMArena Russian | 1466 | 1376 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1472 | 1392 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1325 |
Instruction Following Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 72.8 (#128)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1442 | 1379 |
Long Context Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 42.4 (#127)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1451 | 1389 |
Writing & Preference Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 57.9 (#124)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1474 | 1395 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1459 | 1346 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1477 | 1390 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Muse Spark better than Qwen3.5 35B-A3B?
Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 42.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Muse Spark or Qwen3.5 35B-A3B better for coding?
Muse Spark scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.2 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Muse Spark and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B share?
21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark has 27 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B has 28.