Model comparison
Muse Spark vs Qwen Turbo
Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen Turbo in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark leads 65.7 to 22.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 88.9% for Muse Spark and 6.1% for Qwen Turbo.
Side by side
| Muse Spark | Qwen Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 50.6 | 27.1 |
| Released | 2026-04-08 | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.05 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.20 |
| Results tracked | 27 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 51.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1481 | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 11.3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1474 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 152.04 | — |
Math Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66), Qwen Turbo: 15.3 (#297)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 88.9% | 6.1% |
| ProofBench | 17% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1455 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 39% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 14.6% | — |
Knowledge Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13), Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#272)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 89.8% | 41.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 40.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1457 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1444 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1464 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1509 | — |
| LMArena French | 1497 | — |
| LMArena German | 1497 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1459 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1466 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1472 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1442 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1451 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1474 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1459 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1477 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Muse Spark better than Qwen Turbo?
Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Muse Spark and Qwen Turbo share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark has 27 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Turbo has 3.