Model comparison

Muse Spark vs Qwen Plus

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark Meta

50.6

Rank #46 Confirmed

Qwen Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

37.1

Rank #210 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen Plus in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark leads 65.7 to 27.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 88.9% for Muse Spark and 17.8% for Qwen Plus.

Side by side

Muse Spark and Qwen Plus specifications
Muse SparkQwen Plus
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index50.637.1
Released2026-04-082024-01-25
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—33K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$1.20
Results tracked2720

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69), Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen Plus
LMArena Coding14811328
SciCode51.5%—

Reasoning Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67), Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen Plus
LMArena Hard Prompts14741317
Kagi LLM Benchmark—63.3%
CritPt11.3%—
DTBench—81.1%
LMCA—24%
Epoch Capabilities Index152.04—

Math Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66), Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen Plus
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202588.9%17.8%
LMArena Math14551326
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)39%1.7%
ProofBench17%—
MATH Level 5—65.3%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)14.6%—

Knowledge Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13), Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen Plus
GPQA Diamond89.8%48.1%
LMArena Expert14571328
Humanity's Last Exam40.6%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24), Qwen Plus: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen Plus
LMArena Vision1306—
LMArena Document1444—

Multilingual Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24), Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen Plus
LMArena Non-English14641310
LMArena Chinese15091347
LMArena Russian14661323
LMArena French1497—
LMArena German1497—
LMArena Japanese—1251
LMArena Korean1459—
LMArena Spanish1472—

Instruction Following Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51), Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen Plus
LMArena Instruction Following14421303

Long Context Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69), Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen Plus
LMArena Longer Query14511324

Writing & Preference Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39), Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen Plus
LMArena Text14741326
LMArena Creative Writing14591293
LMArena Multi-Turn14771336

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark better than Qwen Plus?

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Muse Spark or Qwen Plus better for coding?

Muse Spark scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.2 versus 38.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark and Qwen Plus share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark has 27 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.

Related comparisons

Go deeper