Model comparison
Muse Spark vs Qwen-14B
Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen-14B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Spark leads 66.0 to 27.6.
- Qwen-14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Muse Spark | Qwen-14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 50.6 | 31.4 |
| Released | 2026-04-08 | 2023-09-24 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 27 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69), Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#288)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1481 | 1071 |
| SciCode | 51.5% | — |
Reasoning Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67), Qwen-14B: 19.6 (#257)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1474 | 1027 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 152.04 | 113.03 |
| CritPt | 11.3% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55% |
| LAMBADA | — | 71.1% |
| PIQA | — | 79.9% |
Math Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66), Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#227)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1455 | 1068 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 88.9% | — |
| ProofBench | 17% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 39% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 14.6% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 61.3% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13), Qwen-14B: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 89.8% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 40.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1457 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 84.4% |
| BoolQ | — | 86.2% |
| MMLU | — | 66.3% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24), Qwen-14B: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1444 | — |
Multilingual Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24), Qwen-14B: 27.5 (#275)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1464 | 1041 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1509 | 1077 |
| LMArena French | 1497 | — |
| LMArena German | 1497 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1459 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1466 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1472 | — |
Instruction Following Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51), Qwen-14B: 52.4 (#289)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1442 | 1031 |
Long Context Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69), Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#280)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1451 | 1028 |
Writing & Preference Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39), Qwen-14B: 27.6 (#299)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1474 | 1051 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1459 | 1028 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1477 | 1022 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Muse Spark better than Qwen-14B?
Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Muse Spark or Qwen-14B better for coding?
Muse Spark scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.2 versus 31.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Muse Spark and Qwen-14B share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark has 27 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-14B has 18.