Model comparison

Muse Spark 1.3 vs Ring-2.6-1T

Muse Spark 1.3 has enough public results to be ranked (#27); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark 1.3 Meta

54.4

Rank #27 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark 1.3 scores higher in 2 categories and Ring-2.6-1T in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark 1.3 leads 52.9 to 25.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is CritPt: 24.9% for Muse Spark 1.3 and 3.7% for Ring-2.6-1T.
  • Ring-2.6-1T has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Muse Spark 1.3 and Ring-2.6-1T specifications
Muse Spark 1.3Ring-2.6-1T
ProviderMetaAnt Group (inclusionAI)
Noometry Index54.436.3
Released2026-09-022026-05-14
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.25—
Output $ / M tokens$4.25—
Results tracked343

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 56.1 (#18), Ring-2.6-1T: 40.1

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Ring-2.6-1T
SciCode59.7%42.4%
CursorBench41.6%—
LMArena WebDev1655—
LMArena Coding1516—
ALE-Bench—432.57

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 38.6 (#28), Ring-2.6-1T: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Ring-2.6-1T
APEX-Agents57.8%—
GDP.pdf27.6%—

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 52.9 (#27), Ring-2.6-1T: 25.3

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Ring-2.6-1T
CritPt24.9%3.7%
NYT Connections (extended)85.1%—
Chess Puzzles38%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1503—
Mystery Game Puzzles25%—
DTBench96.5%—
LMCA53.9%—
Bench to the Future 30.14—
Epoch Capabilities Index156.89—

Math Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 72.4 (#16), Ring-2.6-1T: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Ring-2.6-1T
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)74.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 446.3%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202599.2%—
LMArena Math1497—

Knowledge Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 42.0 (#92), Ring-2.6-1T: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Ring-2.6-1T
LMArena Expert1516—

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 43.0 (#21), Ring-2.6-1T: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Ring-2.6-1T
LMArena Vision1310—
LMArena Document1471—

Multilingual Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 57.8 (#6), Ring-2.6-1T: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Ring-2.6-1T
LMArena Non-English1485—
LMArena Chinese1527—
LMArena French1534—
LMArena Korean1513—
LMArena Russian1491—
LMArena Spanish1485—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 77.8 (#14), Ring-2.6-1T: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Ring-2.6-1T
LMArena Instruction Following1481—

Long Context Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 45.7 (#29), Ring-2.6-1T: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Ring-2.6-1T
LMArena Longer Query1491—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 73.7 (#10), Ring-2.6-1T: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Ring-2.6-1T
LMArena Text1490—
LMArena Creative Writing1450—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1906—
LMArena Multi-Turn1486—

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark 1.3 better than Ring-2.6-1T?

Muse Spark 1.3 has enough public results to be ranked (#27); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is Muse Spark 1.3 or Ring-2.6-1T better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 56.1 versus 40.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.3 and Ring-2.6-1T share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.3 has 34 scored results on Noometry and Ring-2.6-1T has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper