Model comparison
Muse Spark 1.3 vs Qwen3.5-2B
Muse Spark 1.3 has enough public results to be ranked (#27); Qwen3.5-2B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Muse Spark 1.3 scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.5-2B in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark 1.3 leads 52.9 to 18.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Chess Puzzles: 38% for Muse Spark 1.3 and 0% for Qwen3.5-2B.
- Qwen3.5-2B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Muse Spark 1.3 | Qwen3.5-2B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 54.4 | 28.7 |
| Released | 2026-09-02 | 2026-02-24 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.25 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $4.25 | — |
| Results tracked | 34 | 1 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Muse Spark 1.3: 56.1 (#18), Qwen3.5-2B: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.3 | Qwen3.5-2B |
|---|---|---|
| CursorBench | 41.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1655 | — |
| SciCode | 59.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1516 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Muse Spark 1.3: 38.6 (#28), Qwen3.5-2B: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.3 | Qwen3.5-2B |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 57.8% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 27.6% | — |
Reasoning Muse Spark 1.3 leads
Muse Spark 1.3: 52.9 (#27), Qwen3.5-2B: 18.5
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.3 | Qwen3.5-2B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 38% | 0% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 85.1% | — |
| CritPt | 24.9% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1503 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 25% | — |
| DTBench | 96.5% | — |
| LMCA | 53.9% | — |
| Bench to the Future 3 | 0.14 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 156.89 | — |
Math Not comparable
Muse Spark 1.3: 72.4 (#16), Qwen3.5-2B: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.3 | Qwen3.5-2B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 74.4% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 46.3% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 99.2% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1497 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Muse Spark 1.3: 42.0 (#92), Qwen3.5-2B: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.3 | Qwen3.5-2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1516 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Muse Spark 1.3: 43.0 (#21), Qwen3.5-2B: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.3 | Qwen3.5-2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1310 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1471 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Muse Spark 1.3: 57.8 (#6), Qwen3.5-2B: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.3 | Qwen3.5-2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1485 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1527 | — |
| LMArena French | 1534 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1513 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1491 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1485 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Muse Spark 1.3: 77.8 (#14), Qwen3.5-2B: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.3 | Qwen3.5-2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1481 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Muse Spark 1.3: 45.7 (#29), Qwen3.5-2B: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.3 | Qwen3.5-2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1491 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Muse Spark 1.3: 73.7 (#10), Qwen3.5-2B: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.3 | Qwen3.5-2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1490 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1450 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1906 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1486 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Muse Spark 1.3 better than Qwen3.5-2B?
Muse Spark 1.3 has enough public results to be ranked (#27); Qwen3.5-2B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.3 and Qwen3.5-2B share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.3 has 34 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5-2B has 1.