Model comparison

Muse Spark 1.3 vs Qwen-7B

Muse Spark 1.3 has enough public results to be ranked (#27); Qwen-7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark 1.3 Meta

54.4

Rank #27 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both.
  • Qwen-7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Muse Spark 1.3 and Qwen-7B specifications
Muse Spark 1.3Qwen-7B
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index54.4—
Released2026-09-022023-09-28
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.25—
Output $ / M tokens$4.25—
Results tracked348

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 56.1 (#18), Qwen-7B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen-7B
CursorBench41.6%—
LMArena WebDev1655—
SciCode59.7%—
LMArena Coding1516—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 38.6 (#28), Qwen-7B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen-7B
APEX-Agents57.8%—
GDP.pdf27.6%—

Reasoning Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 52.9 (#27), Qwen-7B: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen-7B
Epoch Capabilities Index156.89106.47
NYT Connections (extended)85.1%—
CritPt24.9%—
Chess Puzzles38%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1503—
Mystery Game Puzzles25%—
DTBench96.5%—
LMCA53.9%—
Bench to the Future 30.14—
BIG-Bench Hard—45%
LAMBADA—67.9%
PIQA—77.9%

Math Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 72.4 (#16), Qwen-7B: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen-7B
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)74.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 446.3%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202599.2%—
LMArena Math1497—
GSM8K—51.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 42.0 (#92), Qwen-7B: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen-7B
LMArena Expert1516—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—75.3%
BoolQ—76.4%
MMLU—45%

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 43.0 (#21), Qwen-7B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen-7B
LMArena Vision1310—
LMArena Document1471—

Multilingual Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 57.8 (#6), Qwen-7B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen-7B
LMArena Non-English1485—
LMArena Chinese1527—
LMArena French1534—
LMArena Korean1513—
LMArena Russian1491—
LMArena Spanish1485—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 77.8 (#14), Qwen-7B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen-7B
LMArena Instruction Following1481—

Long Context Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 45.7 (#29), Qwen-7B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen-7B
LMArena Longer Query1491—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 73.7 (#10), Qwen-7B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen-7B
LMArena Text1490—
LMArena Creative Writing1450—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1906—
LMArena Multi-Turn1486—

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark 1.3 better than Qwen-7B?

Muse Spark 1.3 has enough public results to be ranked (#27); Qwen-7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.3 and Qwen-7B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.3 has 34 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-7B has 8.

Related comparisons

Go deeper