Noometry

Model comparison

Muse Spark 1.3 vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think

Muse Spark 1.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.4 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark 1.3 Meta

54.4

Rank #27 Confirmed

Olmo 3.1 32b Think Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)

37.3

Rank #191 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark 1.3 scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Think in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Muse Spark 1.3 leads 72.4 to 33.6.
  • Olmo 3.1 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Muse Spark 1.3Olmo 3.1 32b Think
ProviderMetaAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index54.437.3
Released2026-09-02—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.25—
Output $ / M tokens$4.25—
Results tracked3415

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 56.1 (#18), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.1 (#186)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Olmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Coding15161292
CursorBench41.6%—
LMArena WebDev1655—
SciCode59.7%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 38.6 (#28), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: —

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Olmo 3.1 32b Think
APEX-Agents57.8%—
GDP.pdf27.6%—

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 52.9 (#27), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 24.1 (#151)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Olmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Hard Prompts15031272
NYT Connections (extended)85.1%—
CritPt24.9%—
Chess Puzzles38%—
Mystery Game Puzzles25%—
DTBench96.5%—
LMCA53.9%—
Bench to the Future 30.14—
Epoch Capabilities Index156.89—

Math Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 72.4 (#16), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 33.6 (#170)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Olmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Math14971305
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)74.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 446.3%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202599.2%—

Knowledge Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 42.0 (#92), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.0 (#178)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Olmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Expert15161294

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 43.0 (#21), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: —

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Olmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Vision1310—
LMArena Document1471—

Multilingual Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 57.8 (#6), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.3 (#226)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Olmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Non-English14851210
LMArena Chinese15271241
LMArena French15341262
LMArena Russian14911193
LMArena Spanish14851288
LMArena German—1260
LMArena Korean1513—

Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 77.8 (#14), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.8 (#213)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Olmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Instruction Following14811246

Long Context Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 45.7 (#29), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#190)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Olmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Longer Query14911272

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 73.7 (#10), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.4 (#215)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Olmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Text14901271
LMArena Creative Writing14501226
LMArena Multi-Turn14861252
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1906—

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark 1.3 better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?

Muse Spark 1.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.4 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Muse Spark 1.3 or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 56.1 versus 37.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.3 and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.3 has 34 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.

Related comparisons

Go deeper