Model comparison

Muse Spark 1.3 vs o1-pro

Muse Spark 1.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.4 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark 1.3 Meta

54.4

Rank #27 Confirmed

o1-pro OpenAI

31.2

Rank #264 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark 1.3 leads 52.9 to 20.2.
  • Muse Spark 1.3 is cheaper at $1.25 / $4.25 per million input/output tokens, against $150 / $600 for o1-pro.
  • Muse Spark 1.3 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 200K.

Side by side

Muse Spark 1.3 and o1-pro specifications
Muse Spark 1.3o1-pro
ProviderMetaOpenAI
Noometry Index54.431.2
Released2026-09-022025-03-19
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M200K
Max output131K100K
Input $ / M tokens$1.25$150
Output $ / M tokens$4.25$600
Results tracked343

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 56.1 (#18), o1-pro: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3o1-pro
CursorBench41.6%—
LMArena WebDev1655—
SciCode59.7%—
LMArena Coding1516—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 38.6 (#28), o1-pro: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3o1-pro
APEX-Agents57.8%—
GDP.pdf27.6%—

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 52.9 (#27), o1-pro: 20.2 (#223)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3o1-pro
NYT Connections (extended)85.1%—
ARC-AGI-1—23.3%
CritPt24.9%—
Chess Puzzles38%—
EnigmaEval—6.1%
LMArena Hard Prompts1503—
Mystery Game Puzzles25%—
DTBench96.5%—
LMCA53.9%—
Bench to the Future 30.14—
Epoch Capabilities Index156.89—

Math Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 72.4 (#16), o1-pro: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3o1-pro
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)74.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 446.3%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202599.2%—
LMArena Math1497—

Knowledge Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 42.0 (#92), o1-pro: 29.3 (#227)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3o1-pro
Humanity's Last Exam—8.1%
LMArena Expert1516—

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 43.0 (#21), o1-pro: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3o1-pro
LMArena Vision1310—
LMArena Document1471—

Multilingual Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 57.8 (#6), o1-pro: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3o1-pro
LMArena Non-English1485—
LMArena Chinese1527—
LMArena French1534—
LMArena Korean1513—
LMArena Russian1491—
LMArena Spanish1485—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 77.8 (#14), o1-pro: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3o1-pro
LMArena Instruction Following1481—

Long Context Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 45.7 (#29), o1-pro: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3o1-pro
LMArena Longer Query1491—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 73.7 (#10), o1-pro: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3o1-pro
LMArena Text1490—
LMArena Creative Writing1450—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1906—
LMArena Multi-Turn1486—

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark 1.3 better than o1-pro?

Muse Spark 1.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.4 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Muse Spark 1.3 or o1-pro?

Muse Spark 1.3 is cheaper. It lists at $1.25 per million input tokens and $4.25 per million output tokens; o1-pro lists at $150 and $600.

Which has the bigger context window?

Muse Spark 1.3 does, with 1.05M tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.3 and o1-pro share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.3 has 34 scored results on Noometry and o1-pro has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper