Model comparison

Muse Spark 1.2 vs StarCoder 2 7B

Muse Spark 1.2 has enough public results to be ranked (#44); StarCoder 2 7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark 1.2 Meta

49.8

Rank #44 Confirmed

StarCoder 2 7B NVIDIA

36.5

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher in 1 category and StarCoder 2 7B in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Muse Spark 1.2 leads 48.6 to 34.2.
  • StarCoder 2 7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Muse Spark 1.2 and StarCoder 2 7B specifications
Muse Spark 1.2StarCoder 2 7B
ProviderMetaNVIDIA
Noometry Index49.836.5
Released2026-08-052024-02-20
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.25—
Output $ / M tokens$4.25—
Results tracked287

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 48.6 (#49), StarCoder 2 7B: 34.2

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2StarCoder 2 7B
DeepSWE54.9%—
LMArena WebDev1532—
FrontierSWE12%—
SciCode56.4%—
WeirdML60.3%—
LMArena Coding1497—
BigCodeBench Complete—27.7%
HumanEval+—29.9%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 29.5 (#77), StarCoder 2 7B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2StarCoder 2 7B
APEX-Agents36.4%—
GDP.pdf16%—

Reasoning Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 50.4 (#32), StarCoder 2 7B: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2StarCoder 2 7B
Epoch Capabilities Index155.1892.92
SimpleBench74.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)79.2%—
CritPt17.7%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1490—
DTBench94.7%—
LMCA48.4%—
WinoGrande—57.1%

Math Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 43.8 (#68), StarCoder 2 7B: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2StarCoder 2 7B
ProofBench43%—
GSM8K—32.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 53.9 (#49), StarCoder 2 7B: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2StarCoder 2 7B
SimpleQA Verified60.3%—
LMArena Expert1485—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—38.7%
MMLU—38.8%

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 42.6 (#24), StarCoder 2 7B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2StarCoder 2 7B
LMArena Vision1304—

Multilingual Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 57.4 (#10), StarCoder 2 7B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2StarCoder 2 7B
LMArena Non-English1479—
LMArena Chinese1519—
LMArena Russian1494—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 77.1 (#30), StarCoder 2 7B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2StarCoder 2 7B
LMArena Instruction Following1466—

Long Context Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 45.4 (#35), StarCoder 2 7B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2StarCoder 2 7B
LMArena Longer Query1483—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 72.6 (#14), StarCoder 2 7B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2StarCoder 2 7B
LMArena Text1486—
LMArena Creative Writing1444—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1840—
LMArena Multi-Turn1504—

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark 1.2 better than StarCoder 2 7B?

Muse Spark 1.2 has enough public results to be ranked (#44); StarCoder 2 7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is Muse Spark 1.2 or StarCoder 2 7B better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.6 versus 34.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.2 and StarCoder 2 7B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.2 has 28 scored results on Noometry and StarCoder 2 7B has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper