Model comparison

Muse Spark 1.2 vs QwQ Plus

Muse Spark 1.2 has enough public results to be ranked (#44); QwQ Plus does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark 1.2 Meta

49.8

Rank #44 Confirmed

QwQ Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

37.9

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark 1.2 leads 53.9 to 36.5.
  • QwQ Plus is cheaper at $0.80 / $2.40 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $4.25 for Muse Spark 1.2.
  • Muse Spark 1.2 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.

Side by side

Muse Spark 1.2 and QwQ Plus specifications
Muse Spark 1.2QwQ Plus
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index49.837.9
Released2026-08-052025-03-05
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M131K
Max output131K8K
Input $ / M tokens$1.25$0.80
Output $ / M tokens$4.25$2.40
Results tracked281

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 48.6 (#49), QwQ Plus: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2QwQ Plus
DeepSWE54.9%—
LMArena WebDev1532—
FrontierSWE12%—
SciCode56.4%—
WeirdML60.3%—
LMArena Coding1497—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 29.5 (#77), QwQ Plus: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2QwQ Plus
APEX-Agents36.4%—
GDP.pdf16%—

Reasoning Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 50.4 (#32), QwQ Plus: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2QwQ Plus
SimpleBench74.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)79.2%—
CritPt17.7%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1490—
DTBench94.7%—
LMCA48.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index155.18—

Math Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 43.8 (#68), QwQ Plus: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2QwQ Plus
ProofBench43%—

Knowledge Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 53.9 (#49), QwQ Plus: 36.5

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2QwQ Plus
GPQA Diamond—65.4%
SimpleQA Verified60.3%—
LMArena Expert1485—

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 42.6 (#24), QwQ Plus: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2QwQ Plus
LMArena Vision1304—

Multilingual Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 57.4 (#10), QwQ Plus: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2QwQ Plus
LMArena Non-English1479—
LMArena Chinese1519—
LMArena Russian1494—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 77.1 (#30), QwQ Plus: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2QwQ Plus
LMArena Instruction Following1466—

Long Context Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 45.4 (#35), QwQ Plus: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2QwQ Plus
LMArena Longer Query1483—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 72.6 (#14), QwQ Plus: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2QwQ Plus
LMArena Text1486—
LMArena Creative Writing1444—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1840—
LMArena Multi-Turn1504—

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark 1.2 better than QwQ Plus?

Muse Spark 1.2 has enough public results to be ranked (#44); QwQ Plus does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, Muse Spark 1.2 or QwQ Plus?

QwQ Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.80 per million input tokens and $2.40 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.2 lists at $1.25 and $4.25.

Which has the bigger context window?

Muse Spark 1.2 does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.2 and QwQ Plus share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.2 has 28 scored results on Noometry and QwQ Plus has 1.

Related comparisons

Go deeper