Model comparison

Muse Spark 1.2 vs Qwen3 Coder Plus

Muse Spark 1.2 has enough public results to be ranked (#48); Qwen3 Coder Plus does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark 1.2 Meta

50.3

Rank #48 Confirmed

Summary

  • Both cost about the same: $1.25 input and $4.25 output per million tokens.
  • Qwen3 Coder Plus has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Muse Spark 1.2 and Qwen3 Coder Plus specifications
Muse Spark 1.2Qwen3 Coder Plus
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index50.3—
Released2026-08-052025-07-23
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M1.05M
Max output131K66K
Input $ / M tokens$1.25$1
Output $ / M tokens$4.25$5
Results tracked311

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 49.2 (#51), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen3 Coder Plus
DeepSWE54.9%—
LMArena WebDev1533—
FrontierSWE12%—
SciCode56.4%—
WeirdML60.3%—
LMArena Coding1495—
ALE-Bench—456.5

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 29.4 (#87), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen3 Coder Plus
APEX-Agents36.4%—
GDP.pdf16%—

Reasoning Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 51.3 (#34), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen3 Coder Plus
SimpleBench74.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)79.2%—
CritPt17.7%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1486—
DTBench94.7%—
LMCA48.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index154.87—

Math Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 46.4 (#70), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen3 Coder Plus
ProofBench43%—
LMArena Math1471—

Knowledge Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 54.1 (#53), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen3 Coder Plus
SimpleQA Verified60.3%—
LMArena Expert1480—

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 43.4 (#25), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen3 Coder Plus
LMArena Vision1305—

Multilingual Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 57.1 (#11), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen3 Coder Plus
LMArena Non-English1478—
LMArena Chinese1511—
LMArena French1513—
LMArena Russian1487—
LMArena Spanish1498—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 76.7 (#36), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen3 Coder Plus
LMArena Instruction Following1461—

Long Context Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 45.2 (#48), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen3 Coder Plus
LMArena Longer Query1475—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 72.3 (#14), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen3 Coder Plus
LMArena Text1482—
LMArena Creative Writing1449—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1840—
LMArena Multi-Turn1494—

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark 1.2 better than Qwen3 Coder Plus?

Muse Spark 1.2 has enough public results to be ranked (#48); Qwen3 Coder Plus does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, Muse Spark 1.2 or Qwen3 Coder Plus?

Qwen3 Coder Plus is cheaper. It lists at $1 per million input tokens and $5 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.2 lists at $1.25 and $4.25.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 1.05M tokens.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.2 and Qwen3 Coder Plus share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.2 has 31 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Plus has 1.

Related comparisons

Go deeper