Model comparison

Muse Spark 1.2 vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview

Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 50.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 21 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark 1.2 Meta

50.3

Rank #48 Confirmed

Qwen3.6 Max Preview Alibaba (Qwen)

51.5

Rank #43 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen3.6 Max Preview in 2 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark 1.2 leads 51.3 to 41.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is SimpleBench: 74.5% for Muse Spark 1.2 and 63% for Qwen3.6 Max Preview.
  • Muse Spark 1.2 is cheaper at $1.25 / $4.25 per million input/output tokens, against $1.30 / $7.80 for Qwen3.6 Max Preview.
  • Muse Spark 1.2 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.

Side by side

Muse Spark 1.2 and Qwen3.6 Max Preview specifications
Muse Spark 1.2Qwen3.6 Max Preview
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index50.351.5
Released2026-08-052026-04-20
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M262K
Max output131K66K
Input $ / M tokens$1.25$1.30
Output $ / M tokens$4.25$7.80
Results tracked3129

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Muse Spark 1.2: 49.2 (#51), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 48.7 (#54)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena WebDev15331482
LMArena Coding14951471
SWE-bench Verified—76.7%
DeepSWE54.9%—
FrontierSWE12%—
SciCode56.4%—
WeirdML60.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 29.4 (#87), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen3.6 Max Preview
APEX-Agents36.4%—
GDP.pdf16%—
Vending-Bench 2—4,254

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 51.3 (#34), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 41.7 (#53)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen3.6 Max Preview
SimpleBench74.5%63%
NYT Connections (extended)79.2%74.1%
LMArena Hard Prompts14861457
DTBench94.7%87.2%
LMCA48.4%42.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index154.87149.24
CritPt17.7%—
Chess Puzzles—20%
Mystery Game Puzzles—19%

Math Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 46.4 (#70), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.1 (#46)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Math14711465
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—91.1%
ProofBench43%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—23.1%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—4.2%

Knowledge Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 54.1 (#53), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 57.6 (#39)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen3.6 Max Preview
SimpleQA Verified60.3%52%
LMArena Expert14801478
GPQA Diamond—87.4%

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 43.4 (#25), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Vision1305—

Multilingual Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 57.1 (#11), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.2 (#48)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Non-English14781437
LMArena Chinese15111487
LMArena French15131449
LMArena Russian14871445
LMArena Spanish14981454

Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 76.7 (#36), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 75.7 (#55)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Instruction Following14611438

Long Context Too close to call

Muse Spark 1.2: 45.2 (#48), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 44.6 (#61)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Longer Query14751457

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 72.3 (#14), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 63.8 (#60)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Text14821447
LMArena Creative Writing14491435
LMArena Multi-Turn14941456
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1840—

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark 1.2 better than Qwen3.6 Max Preview?

Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 50.3 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Muse Spark 1.2 or Qwen3.6 Max Preview?

Muse Spark 1.2 is cheaper. It lists at $1.25 per million input tokens and $4.25 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 Max Preview lists at $1.30 and $7.80.

Is Muse Spark 1.2 or Qwen3.6 Max Preview better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (49.2 vs 48.7); test both on your own repository before choosing.

Which has the bigger context window?

Muse Spark 1.2 does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.2 and Qwen3.6 Max Preview share?

21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.2 has 31 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Max Preview has 29.

Related comparisons

Go deeper