Model comparison

Muse Spark 1.2 vs Qwen3.5-4B

Muse Spark 1.2 has enough public results to be ranked (#44); Qwen3.5-4B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark 1.2 Meta

49.8

Rank #44 Confirmed

Qwen3.5-4B Alibaba (Qwen)

36.2

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Muse Spark 1.2 leads 43.8 to 33.2.
  • Qwen3.5-4B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Muse Spark 1.2 and Qwen3.5-4B specifications
Muse Spark 1.2Qwen3.5-4B
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index49.836.2
Released2026-08-052026-02-24
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.25—
Output $ / M tokens$4.25—
Results tracked281

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 48.6 (#49), Qwen3.5-4B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen3.5-4B
DeepSWE54.9%—
LMArena WebDev1532—
FrontierSWE12%—
SciCode56.4%—
WeirdML60.3%—
LMArena Coding1497—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 29.5 (#77), Qwen3.5-4B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen3.5-4B
APEX-Agents36.4%—
GDP.pdf16%—

Reasoning Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 50.4 (#32), Qwen3.5-4B: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen3.5-4B
SimpleBench74.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)79.2%—
CritPt17.7%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1490—
DTBench94.7%—
LMCA48.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index155.18—

Math Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 43.8 (#68), Qwen3.5-4B: 33.2

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen3.5-4B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—55.8%
ProofBench43%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 53.9 (#49), Qwen3.5-4B: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen3.5-4B
SimpleQA Verified60.3%—
LMArena Expert1485—

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 42.6 (#24), Qwen3.5-4B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen3.5-4B
LMArena Vision1304—

Multilingual Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 57.4 (#10), Qwen3.5-4B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen3.5-4B
LMArena Non-English1479—
LMArena Chinese1519—
LMArena Russian1494—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 77.1 (#30), Qwen3.5-4B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen3.5-4B
LMArena Instruction Following1466—

Long Context Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 45.4 (#35), Qwen3.5-4B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen3.5-4B
LMArena Longer Query1483—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 72.6 (#14), Qwen3.5-4B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen3.5-4B
LMArena Text1486—
LMArena Creative Writing1444—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1840—
LMArena Multi-Turn1504—

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark 1.2 better than Qwen3.5-4B?

Muse Spark 1.2 has enough public results to be ranked (#44); Qwen3.5-4B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.2 and Qwen3.5-4B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.2 has 28 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5-4B has 1.

Related comparisons

Go deeper