Model comparison

Muse Spark 1.2 vs Qwen2.5-Max

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 40.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark 1.2 Meta

50.3

Rank #48 Confirmed

Qwen2.5-Max Alibaba (Qwen)

40.7

Rank #146 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen2.5-Max in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark 1.2 leads 51.3 to 25.6.

Side by side

Muse Spark 1.2 and Qwen2.5-Max specifications
Muse Spark 1.2Qwen2.5-Max
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index50.340.7
Released2026-08-052025-01-25
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.25—
Output $ / M tokens$4.25—
Results tracked3127

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 49.2 (#51), Qwen2.5-Max: 41.8 (#117)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen2.5-Max
LMArena Coding14951359
DeepSWE54.9%—
LMArena WebDev1533—
FrontierSWE12%—
SciCode56.4%—
WeirdML60.3%—
LiveBench Coding—64.4%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 29.4 (#87), Qwen2.5-Max: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen2.5-Max
APEX-Agents36.4%—
GDP.pdf16%—

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 51.3 (#34), Qwen2.5-Max: 25.6 (#147)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen2.5-Max
LMArena Hard Prompts14861360
Epoch Capabilities Index154.87132.53
SimpleBench74.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)79.2%—
CritPt17.7%—
LiveBench Reasoning—51.4%
DTBench94.7%—
LiveBench Data Analysis—67.9%
LMCA48.4%—
LiveBench—62.3%

Math Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 46.4 (#70), Qwen2.5-Max: 36.9 (#162)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen2.5-Max
LMArena Math14711369
ProofBench43%—
LiveBench Math—58.4%

Knowledge Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 54.1 (#53), Qwen2.5-Max: 35.3 (#186)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen2.5-Max
LMArena Expert14801337
SimpleQA Verified60.3%—
Confabulations—21.8%

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 43.4 (#25), Qwen2.5-Max: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen2.5-Max
LMArena Vision1305—

Multilingual Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 57.1 (#11), Qwen2.5-Max: 48.1 (#146)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen2.5-Max
LMArena Non-English14781352
LMArena Chinese15111382
LMArena French15131396
LMArena Russian14871353
LMArena Spanish14981377
LMArena German—1350
LMArena Japanese—1300
LMArena Korean—1304

Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 76.7 (#36), Qwen2.5-Max: 71.3 (#152)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen2.5-Max
LMArena Instruction Following14611335
LiveBench Instruction Following—75.3%

Long Context Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 45.2 (#48), Qwen2.5-Max: 41.4 (#142)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen2.5-Max
LMArena Longer Query14751358

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 72.3 (#14), Qwen2.5-Max: 55.4 (#146)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen2.5-Max
LMArena Text14821367
LMArena Creative Writing14491339
LMArena Multi-Turn14941364
Short-Story Creative Writing—72.9%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1840—
LiveBench Language—56.3%

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark 1.2 better than Qwen2.5-Max?

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 40.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Muse Spark 1.2 or Qwen2.5-Max better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.2 versus 41.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.2 and Qwen2.5-Max share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.2 has 31 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Max has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper