Model comparison

Muse Spark 1.2 vs Olmo 7b Instruct

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark 1.2 Meta

50.3

Rank #48 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher in 6 categories and Olmo 7b Instruct in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Spark 1.2 leads 72.3 to 25.8.
  • Olmo 7b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Muse Spark 1.2 and Olmo 7b Instruct specifications
Muse Spark 1.2Olmo 7b Instruct
ProviderMetaAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index50.330.3
Released2026-08-05—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.25—
Output $ / M tokens$4.25—
Results tracked3110

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 49.2 (#51), Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Olmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Coding14951016
DeepSWE54.9%—
LMArena WebDev1533—
FrontierSWE12%—
SciCode56.4%—
WeirdML60.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 29.4 (#87), Olmo 7b Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Olmo 7b Instruct
APEX-Agents36.4%—
GDP.pdf16%—

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 51.3 (#34), Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Olmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts1486993
SimpleBench74.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)79.2%—
CritPt17.7%—
DTBench94.7%—
LMCA48.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index154.87—

Math Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 46.4 (#70), Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Olmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Math14711018
ProofBench43%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 54.1 (#53), Olmo 7b Instruct: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Olmo 7b Instruct
SimpleQA Verified60.3%—
LMArena Expert1480—

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 43.4 (#25), Olmo 7b Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Olmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Vision1305—

Multilingual Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 57.1 (#11), Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Olmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Non-English1478977
LMArena Chinese15111014
LMArena Russian1487947
LMArena French1513—
LMArena Spanish1498—

Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 76.7 (#36), Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Olmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following1461978

Long Context Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 45.2 (#48), Olmo 7b Instruct: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Olmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1475—

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 72.3 (#14), Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Olmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Text14821032
LMArena Creative Writing1449990
LMArena Multi-Turn14941007
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1840—

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark 1.2 better than Olmo 7b Instruct?

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Muse Spark 1.2 or Olmo 7b Instruct better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.2 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.2 and Olmo 7b Instruct share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.2 has 31 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 7b Instruct has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper