Model comparison

Muse Spark 1.1 vs Yi-Large

Muse Spark 1.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#51); Yi-Large does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark 1.1 Meta

49.9

Rank #51 Confirmed

Yi-Large 01.AI

38.1

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • The widest gap is in coding, where Muse Spark 1.1 leads 51.3 to 36.7.

Side by side

Muse Spark 1.1 and Yi-Large specifications
Muse Spark 1.1Yi-Large
ProviderMeta01.AI
Noometry Index49.938.1
Released2026-04-082024-05-13
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.25—
Output $ / M tokens$4.25—
Results tracked373

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Muse Spark 1.1: 51.3 (#40), Yi-Large: 36.7 (#203)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Yi-Large
DeepSWE53.3%—
LMArena WebDev1542—
SciCode58.8%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—37.7%
LMArena Coding1498—
BigCodeBench Complete—47.2%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 30.8 (#73), Yi-Large: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Yi-Large
APEX-Agents31.8%—
τ²-bench Banking40.5%—
GBAEval7.9%—
GDP.pdf15%—
Vending-Bench 26,520—

Reasoning Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 47.1 (#44), Yi-Large: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Yi-Large
NYT Connections (extended)84.9%—
CritPt15.1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1486—
DTBench94.4%—
LMCA49.9%—
Surface Evolver Bench52.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index154.21—

Math Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 45.5 (#76), Yi-Large: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Yi-Large
ProofBench39%—
LMArena Math1483—

Knowledge Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 53.1 (#59), Yi-Large: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Yi-Large
SimpleQA Verified57.8%—
LMArena Expert1478—
MMLU—79.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 42.6 (#29), Yi-Large: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Yi-Large
LMArena Vision1293—
LMArena Document1465—

Multilingual Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 56.7 (#17), Yi-Large: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Yi-Large
LMArena Non-English1472—
LMArena Chinese1518—
LMArena French1494—
LMArena German1466—
LMArena Japanese1451—
LMArena Korean1458—
LMArena Russian1483—
LMArena Spanish1464—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 76.5 (#39), Yi-Large: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Yi-Large
LMArena Instruction Following1457—

Long Context Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 44.8 (#58), Yi-Large: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Yi-Large
LMArena Longer Query1462—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 73.4 (#11), Yi-Large: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Yi-Large
LMArena Text1479—
LMArena Creative Writing1437—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1927—
EQ-Bench 41260—
LMArena Multi-Turn1485—

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark 1.1 better than Yi-Large?

Muse Spark 1.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#51); Yi-Large does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is Muse Spark 1.1 or Yi-Large better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.3 versus 36.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.1 and Yi-Large share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.1 has 37 scored results on Noometry and Yi-Large has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper